Posted by T.L. (IP: 206.133.171.112) on July 05, 1999 at 01:24:28:
In Reply to: Re: 289 vs 302 posted by scully on July 04, 1999 at 21:01:24:
: More stroke more torque ,( but some 289s did have some better valve
The 289s had the SAME size valves as the 302s...The high-perf 289 had smaller closed cumbustion chambers which yields higher compression...
sizes in them)its been a while since iv done one but i think tht the only difference are the piston skirts. someone please correct me if im wrong!!
: : Talking to someone today and he said that a 289 will bolt up to a mav without any modification...
: : advantages? disadvantages??