In mustangs, the multiport EFI started in 86' n/m

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Maverick Message Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by WM (IP: 198.150.53.102) on September 08, 1999 at 17:03:49:

In Reply to: Re: The newer EFI 302 has a rear sump oil pan.... posted by Inshan on September 08, 1999 at 09:41:17:

: Does anyone know when the 302 started coming fuel injected?

: while the older 302 mavericks have a front sump pan. I think you have to use the front sump in the mav.

: : : I've been considering swapping out my 250 for a 302, so the first thing I did was go to the junkyards to price out a 302. The guys there said the 302s they have are from mustangs, rangers etc. and all are fuel injected, and that would be a problem to fit.
: : : I personally would rather not have anything to do with the fuel injected engines but I thought TBI could just be replaced with a carb?
: : : Are the later 302s TBI or Multi-point?
: : : In short, which 302 should I be looking for?

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: : Does anyone know when the 302 started coming fuel injected? : : while the older 302 mavericks have a front sump pan. I think you have to use the front sump in the mav. : : : : I've been considering swapping out my 250 for a 302, so the first thing I did was go to the junkyards to price out a 302. The guys there said the 302s they have are from mustangs, rangers etc. and all are fuel injected, and that would be a problem to fit. : : : : I personally would rather not have anything to do with the fuel injected engines but I thought TBI could just be replaced with a carb? : : : : Are the later 302s TBI or Multi-point? : : : : In short, which 302 should I be looking for?

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Maverick Message Board ] [ FAQ ]