You're right...see post below..(n/m)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Maverick Message Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Brian (IP: 208.254.241.141) on September 12, 1999 at 03:02:03:

In Reply to: I don't think you need to shorten the driveshaft. n/m posted by Brandon on September 10, 1999 at 16:36:17:

: : Okay, life with my Mav just got kicked into high gear...

: : Timing chain is shot..big time. The car barely runs. So, my
: : plans for rebuilding my spare engine are being accelerated really quickly.
: : So, naturally, I have a few questions:

: : 1. A freind of mine has an AOD tranny that he just removed from his car.
: : This tranny was rebuilt within the last two years. Besides the required
: : aftermarket shifter (for overdrive), and shortening the driveshaft
: : is there anything else required to make this work.

: : 2. What would be better, a set of early heads reworked or a set of late
: : model 5.0 heads? Can a set of basically stock (port & polish etc)
: : '70ish 302 heads flow with a decent cam and 600cfm carb?

: : Here's what I am considering:

: : Holley 600 (model 4160 modified to a 4150 (almost...))
: : Edelbrock Performer RPM Intake
: : Edelbrock Performer RPM cam & lifters (or Motorsport 270 int, 280 exh
: : duration and 472 int, 484 exh lift)
: : MSD 6AL ignition system
: : 9.0:1 compression
: : TCI Rattler or Fluidamper
: : 3.55 rearend
: : 2 1/4" exhaust with Dynomax mufflers

: : Any advise would be welcome and appreciated

: : P.S., if any one with Desk Top Dyno feels
: : up to it, I would appreciate know about
: : what to expect from this engine

: : Thanks, Brian




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Maverick Message Board ] [ FAQ ]