Posted by T.L. (IP: 209.138.164.57) on May 27, 2000 at 00:02:45:
In Reply to: okeedokee posted by 74merc on May 26, 2000 at 17:00:26:
Hope you have some decent gears with that cam...at least 3.50-3.70 ...
: I'm looking at a 270 dur w/.501 lift, not much bigger, but a little more top end power... just curious... I agree your choice is more streetable...
:
: : not really, when it comes to cams and carbs it's always better to start with a "milder" looking one. There is to many influenceing components that will effect the engine's power, ie, valve size, comp., head design, header size and length, trans type, torque conv. size, tire size, gear ratio, car weight, where in the country you are, (weather, altitude), etc. Then there is the "intended" usage. Street use always go smaller or they become a pig. Racing? whole new ball game.
: : Trust me, I've been playing with these things since 71 and it's real easy to build a "dog" that is no fun to drive.
:
: : : just wondering why your recommending such a mild cam...
: : : : and as for a cam, go with something around .460 lift and about 215 degs duration at .050 lift, hyd. type
: : :
: : : :
: : : : : I'm rebuilding a Falcon for a friend that doesn't have much money, can you explain a little bit more that FAMOS 302/289 trick ( conrods ) & in such case what kind of camshaft would you suggest for that 302 with 289 conrods ,the car has a 4s Manual transmision 8" rear end & he already bought a Weiand Excelerator intake manifold, a holley performer 600 & some headers ?
: : : : : Thnks