Re: Old Guy  
Re: Re: Old Guy -- Ken Merring Post Reply Top of thread Maverick Message Board
Posted by: Old Guy ®
2001/07/13, 15:33:48

Author Profile
::Old Guy?
::I have always heard talk about 351W 2V and 4V heads.
::I read something recently that says they are the exact
::same head with no differences in valve size until '75
::when the same head from the 302(valve size) was put on the 351W. I know for a fact that there are differences
::between the 351C 2V and 4V. I have also read that all
::289 heads from 65-68 are the same size chambers and design
::the only difference being the screw in studs for the hi-po
::versions.
::Is this true?
:
:Not jumping in place of Old Guy to answer your question on this one. I desire to see him answer you.
:My reserch shows that the 351w-2v,4v had all the same sizes except that the combustion chamber was very slightly smaller on the 4v unit. 2v chambers can be made the same or smaller just by having .010 or more milled off the gasket surface. Casting # for 2v= D0OZ-6049 C and 4v= D0OZ-6049 F.

I think Ken is right on the money with the 351w, I used the c90e-b on my sons 302 with great results(did gasket match the Ports). As far as I know on the 289,s you are correct, of course there are some diff's in push rod holes, rail rockers, and thermacters, also I did read once that the 68 models-C80e-D and-L and -M's had 63cc chambers for lower compression on th 2V engines. Most Ford people will tell you that the only real draw back to production engines are the flow of the heads(mainly the exhaust side), for everyday driveability though, they perform well. Just us fellows that have this high octane blood in our veins, that craves "More Power", are going to change "Henry's" basic design. I think I have rambled on long enough. Got to get ready to go "Racin" this weekend. You know it's sure gettin harder to climb into and out of that car, but I'll keep doing it till the end(The good Lord willing).


Post Reply | Alert Original message Top of thread Return to the MMB