Brakes Question

Discussion in 'Technical' started by TeeEl, May 4, 2023.

  1. TeeEl

    TeeEl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2019
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    237
    Location:
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Ford Maverick Resto-Mod
    I noticed that the early Mavericks with 8-inch rear-end list a rear wheel cylinder with a smaller (7/8") bore than the later Mavericks (15/16"). I am wondering what the benefit of the larger bore is. I know front disc brakes became standard for '76 models. Is there a reason that a larger bore rear wheel cylinder would work better with having discs up front?...
     
  2. greasemonkey

    greasemonkey Burnin corn

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,401
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Sedalia,MO
    Vehicle:
    1973 ford maverick Grabber,2017 dodge ram,88t-bird,indian scout,Indian Chieftain.95 Mustang GT
    Less brake pedal travel.
     
    TeeEl likes this.
  3. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,782
    Likes Received:
    669
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    That's my guess, too. Disc brake pads don't have to move as far as drum shoes so the larger cylinder moves the shoes with less pedal travel.
     
    TeeEl likes this.
  4. TeeEl

    TeeEl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2019
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    237
    Location:
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Ford Maverick Resto-Mod
    Upon further research, according to the information I've read, larger bore wheel cylinders for rear wheels will cause rear brakes to apply more force and make pedal stroke a little longer.
    This seems to explain the longer push-rod and higher pedal on the '74-'77 models with manual brakes...
     
  5. greasemonkey

    greasemonkey Burnin corn

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,401
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Sedalia,MO
    Vehicle:
    1973 ford maverick Grabber,2017 dodge ram,88t-bird,indian scout,Indian Chieftain.95 Mustang GT
    That makes sense of you think about it. I was thinking backwards.larger bore master would make it shorter travel.
     
  6. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,645
    Likes Received:
    2,393
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..
    Large bore cylinders move more fluid, increase braking effort. Offset by adding power brakes.
     
  7. CaptainComet

    CaptainComet Large Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    436
    Trophy Points:
    413
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet
    When we added disc brakes to my 72 Comet, I found it necessary to add an adjustable proportioning valve to DECREASE how well the rear brakes were working. We did not change the wheel cylinders to the larger size (didn't know that was a thing). The car was locking up the rears too easily after the change. The larger bore cylinders likely would have fixed that.
     
  8. TeeEl

    TeeEl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2019
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    237
    Location:
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Ford Maverick Resto-Mod
    I had noticed that '76 and '77 calls for the 15/16" bore while all the previous years call for the '7/8". The '75 Granada rear-end on my Maverick also calls for the 15/16" bore.
    Obviously front discs were optional for Mavericks in '74 & '75. I'm pretty sure '74 didn't even have a proportioning valve. It looks like these brake systems gradually "evolved" over a few years...
     
  9. CaptainComet

    CaptainComet Large Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    436
    Trophy Points:
    413
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet
    Instead of a proportioning valve, they had a combination valve that I believe had Prop function along with housing the sensor to tell you the brakes crapped out.??

    Someone help here, I am firing some really old brain cells trying to remember this. LOL.
     
    plynch and Shorty like this.
  10. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,645
    Likes Received:
    2,393
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..
    Right...

    Through '69 disc brakes used separate distribution/pressure differential block & proportioning valve. Beginning 1970 the porp valve along with brake differential was integrated into the dist block. Drum brakes used a dist block/pressure differential without proportioning. Other than mounting, one on my '69 Fairlane was same as Comet.
     
  11. TeeEl

    TeeEl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2019
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    237
    Location:
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Ford Maverick Resto-Mod
    That's what I mean. The '74 distribution block looks just like the '71-'73, and the fittings are the same size, including on those with the front disc option. '75-'77 is different. Different size fittings, and mounts differently as well. It appears to me that '74 was the only year that used that distribution block with disc brakes...
     

Share This Page