never before in a maverick

Discussion in 'Technical' started by idrivemav, Jan 29, 2012.

  1. idrivemav

    idrivemav Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    texas
    Vehicle:
    1975 maverick
    hey guys i know most will disaprove of this but i have a 6.1hemi and 5 speed auto probably goin in my mav it has 420hp stock and will get much better mpg than my 306 but at least its not a chevy motor
     
  2. Resto

    Resto Benders Evil Twin

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,293
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    147
    Location:
    Yuma AZ
    Vehicle:
    73 Mav Buckets(69 351W, soon to be 408) Floorshift FXBDY AOD ,07 Glide,06 E250HA,01 Silverado
    LMAO...:biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:Do you really think its never been done before? Publish some time slips.:)
     
  3. idrivemav

    idrivemav Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    texas
    Vehicle:
    1975 maverick
    idk if a new hemi has been put in a mav im sure old hemis have if there has been a new hemi put in one i would love to see some pics heck id like to see pics of a old hemi in a mav
     
  4. darren

    darren Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,852
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    East of Dave
    Vehicle:
    72 302 Maverick
    Thats a big motor and trans. I assume you have removed your shock towers? Not so sure the auto trans will fit the tunnel either.
     
  5. Resto

    Resto Benders Evil Twin

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,293
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    147
    Location:
    Yuma AZ
    Vehicle:
    73 Mav Buckets(69 351W, soon to be 408) Floorshift FXBDY AOD ,07 Glide,06 E250HA,01 Silverado
    I meant no disrespect by that post. I was amused by youre statement. Ive lived long enough to realize that its all been done before. The sages on this forum have done it all. If you want to put a hemi in your mav these are the people who can help you. Be forwarned most here wont like it. :clap::clap::clap:
     
  6. yellow75

    yellow75 MCCI Oregon State Rep Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2004
    Messages:
    4,777
    Likes Received:
    1,160
    Trophy Points:
    587
    Garage:
    2
    Location:
    Tillamook Oregon
    Vehicle:
    72 Maverick 1976 Maverick Stallion 2007 Shelby GT 500 2019 Ford F150 FX4 2023 Bronco
    More power to you, in more ways than one :) heck if a guy can put a Viper v10 in one then a Hemi should be a cinch.

    Keep us updated like it or not we still like to read about it :Handshake
     
  7. ESampson

    ESampson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    1,453
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    Nanaimo, BC
    Vehicle:
    1974 Comet GT
    did that viperv10 car ever finnish? or still un-updated since ?
     
  8. Pony Express

    Pony Express Haul'in @**

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    839
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    65
    Location:
    DelMarVa
    Vehicle:
    1976 Maverick
    I'm intrigued by the intention, but forced to inquire; why go through the pain of trying to adapt a completely different power plant/transmission when you can obtain the same hp from the actual manufacturer itself, using what it offers and has proven?
     
  9. markso125

    markso125 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    117
    Location:
    Lewiston Ut
    Vehicle:
    1972 maverick 2 door LDO
    Ah it cant be any harder to put in there then the Caddy motor was to put in a maverick. He just had to cut the towers, make the exhaust manifolds, redo the front suspension with a mustang II kit, have a custom rear driveshaft made and redo the tunnel before it could even fit. Of course getting rid of the little 8" in the rear is going to have to be factored in because if you are doing that much work and putting that big of an engine in whey dont you upgrade the rear axle too.
    Of course thats just getting it in the car making it run is another story you need to make your own wiring harnesses to run both the fuel injection system and transmission, yes the transmission is controlled by the ECU. So if you are pulling the setup from a donor car you might want to gut all the wiring with the car. But that brings you to another can of worms dealing with the factory security system, from there you have to start adapting things like the steering column and everything to make the ECM work, or else you have to get your Eprom re-flashed to no longer search for the chip in the key.
    Or you could get a carburated manifold and bypass the fuel injection and all the advantages it might bring, like the fuel economy mode where it shuts off the engine cylinders as you are driveing but you will still have to buy an aftermarket controller to run the transmission....Arent new cars wonderful...
    The other option is to buy something like an AEM universal setup for the EFI but those are pretty pricey, usually in the several thousand dollar range for a universal setup and wiring. Or you can go with something like a megasquirt III you can either build it yourself and save you some money or you can buy one pre-assembled, you still have to figure it out and tune it yourself... but wait you still have to buy the transmission controller with either one of those options.....
    Of course running all the new fuel systems is a given so I wont go in depth on that...and we havent even started on the price of aftermarket guages that you would probably need to get everything to work.

    And as for better gas mileage :biglaugh:

    Why dont you pass around what you are smoking it must be good stuff if you think those engines got good fuel economy... The 2010 model year was the last year Chrystler put the 6.1L and 5 speed auto option in their cars, heck it was the last year of the 6.1L and they got a whopping 13 mpg city and 19 mpg highway in the rear wheel drive Charger, heck even the 2010 6.1L in the challenger with a 6 speed manual only got 14 mpg city and 22 mpg highway...(if you dont believe me on the numbers here you go http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymake/Dodge2010.shtml) heck even the 8.4L V 10 viper engine gets better fuel economy then that setup, just barely better but it is better. Also remember it is a premium fuel engine only, they will tend to knock on mid grade or regular unleaded.:16suspect

    There are plenty of members on here getting 400 HP and similar fuel economy if not much better for allot less money into their 306, 331, whatever. Heck you could put a vortech supercharger on it with 8-10 psi of boost get 400+ horsepower on your engine and get a heck of allot better fuel economy. Ironically enough if you look at the fuel economy for the last couple years that the 5.0 was put in the mustang say 1992 the engine gets 16 mpg city and 23 mpg highway with a 4 speed AOD transmission.http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/8698.shtml
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2012
  10. Pony Express

    Pony Express Haul'in @**

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    839
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    65
    Location:
    DelMarVa
    Vehicle:
    1976 Maverick
    You've gone to lengths in making my point abundantly clear - I couldn't have said it more thoroughly myself...
     
  11. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,583
    Likes Received:
    2,933
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    I don't think gas milage is an issue at 500+ HP.
    no different than the...4.6s...that are "being" installed :rolleyes: ...just another motor...
    being different isn't always hard...for everybody...:tiphat:
    ...any 500+ HP motor needs a car built around it...:huh:
    some people take a year or longer to install a 351 and most if not all of them are carbed...:bouncy:

    I say...go for it...:thumbs2:

    ...back to making...:chirp:...with my carbed, factory EFI only engine...
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2012
  12. markso125

    markso125 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    117
    Location:
    Lewiston Ut
    Vehicle:
    1972 maverick 2 door LDO
    I brought up fuel economy because of his first post because apparently it is a major issue.
     
  13. Pony Express

    Pony Express Haul'in @**

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    839
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    65
    Location:
    DelMarVa
    Vehicle:
    1976 Maverick
    And, somehow, I was noted for it...
     
  14. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,583
    Likes Received:
    2,933
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    that was my intent also...it may have been misdirected...:Handshake
     
  15. Joe Dirt

    Joe Dirt BBF life

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    4,375
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Cleveland, TN
    Vehicle:
    1970 ford torino #1
    I have thought about putting a stoked 6.1 in mine (426 cu in) that a guy has here local
     

Share This Page