how much power would I lose using manifolds?

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by slopoke, Jan 7, 2015.

  1. slopoke

    slopoke Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Location:
    San Antonio TX
    Vehicle:
    1977 ford maverick
    I am a couple weeks away from installing a 351w into my 77. Im under the impression that my 6901 headers will not work. So my question is, what would the power loss be (rough estimate) if i used manifolds until i can spring for the crites headers? This is a modestly built engine 350hp at the flywheel.

    thanks in advance for your input.
     
  2. Acornridgeman

    Acornridgeman MCCI Wisconsin State Rep Moderator Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    6,511
    Likes Received:
    950
    Trophy Points:
    426
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    70 Maverick Grabber, 72 Maverick Grabber Restomod
    I remember reading some magazine articles where they did dyno tests on different headers vs stock cast iron manifolds. 10-15 hp was the norm. I think like 25 hp was the best. Had a lot to do with RPM ranges too.
     
  3. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    I don't think you would notice it if you weren't drag racing and watching an ET clock.
     
  4. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,589
    Likes Received:
    2,935
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    if you are going headers...why worry about it? (10-15)
     
  5. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    It will sound different, quieter, less "pingy". Otherwise, I doubt you would notice much difference.
     
  6. rotorr22

    rotorr22 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,302
    Likes Received:
    259
    Trophy Points:
    211
    Location:
    Columbiana, Ohio
    Vehicle:
    2018 F150 XLT/5.0, 2014 Focus 5 spd manual,1974 Maverick Grabber, 1986 Thunderbird Elan 5.0/AOD
    Depends to a degree on the heads and cam. On a stock engine, I would expect the losses to be in the 10-15 HP range as suggested. Throw in a good flowing set of heads, more aggressive cam timing, RPM limit and the loss would be significantly higher staying with manifolds.

    We used to see this with marine engines all the time.
     
  7. 7D2 Grabber

    7D2 Grabber Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    999
    Likes Received:
    163
    Trophy Points:
    147
    Location:
    Northern CA, Bay Area
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT, 1967 F100 short bed, 2008 Z06
    If you have to use manifolds, smooth them out and port them. 15 hp on a 350 hp mill sounds about right.
     
  8. Drew Hierwarter

    Drew Hierwarter Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2014
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    61
    Location:
    Kingsport, TN
    Vehicle:
    1976 Comet
    I agree with scooper77515 above. If this is strictly for street use I doubt you'd notice the difference. It will be quieter inside the car. I have had cars with headers on the street before and, trust me, the resonance can get old after a while.
     
  9. Lee Richart

    Lee Richart Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Location:
    Redford, MI
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick LDO 421W
    I have done a couple of these swaps and I will bet that a 351W will not fit unless you have modified the spring towers.
    Lee
     
  10. slopoke

    slopoke Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Location:
    San Antonio TX
    Vehicle:
    1977 ford maverick
    I have notched the shock towers and done a few other mods on top of that. Im thinking ill just have to bite the bullet and order the CRITES headers after I try and modify my hooker 6901's (and fail) of course.
    and thanks to everyone for the replies... most helpful! This is one of the best forums on the net. Thanks Guys
     

    Attached Files:

  11. jasonwthompson

    jasonwthompson Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,373
    Likes Received:
    472
    Trophy Points:
    196
    Location:
    Carrollton TX
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet
    That's a good looking job on those towers.
     
  12. slopoke

    slopoke Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Location:
    San Antonio TX
    Vehicle:
    1977 ford maverick
    thanks jasonwthompson, i drove myself nuts trying to get them perfect! Had to force myself to be happy with it lol
     
  13. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    If you're NOT currently running a very high flow and correctly sized exhaust system?(most aren't with cookie cutter sized bolt on parts and crimp bent exhaust pipes).. the manifolds will cost you a solid 25 horse up top and cause your peak to fall off MUCH quicker. This of course cuts the rev range and more importantly.. AVERAGE power.

    IF.. you already have a better sized system that still flows sufficient mass for these small motors?.. the losses will be even greater. IMHO, very rarely does a 302 need anything more than a 1.5" - 1.625" primary pipe.. matched to a 2.5" collector. Anything larger gains flow with a major loss in gas velocity as the compromise. Never good to lose velocity right near the start and towards middle of an exhaust system.

    Oops.. too many tabs open. A 351 can extend that optimum sizing towards a 1.625" primary matched to a 2.5" collector. If you ever intend to stroke it, and/or run more compression, and/or rev it higher?.. step up to a 1.75" primary and a 3" collector.
     
  14. slopoke

    slopoke Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Location:
    San Antonio TX
    Vehicle:
    1977 ford maverick
    Good info groberts101, I agree on primary and collector sizes. I currently have zero exhaust so I'm free to do what i want! I have some exhaust plans I'm going to keep under wraps until completed but for now, probably just 2.5" pipes,quietest mufflers i can find and dumps. I also decided to buy several used sets of headers(not manifolds) for various makes and models under 50 bucks a piece (craigslist). I thought i would see what would be the easiest to modify, and re-sell the others. Im hoping to find a cheaper option than CRITES. I spent too much money on the 351 to justify using manifolds and losing 25 hp. I guess we will see how it goes.
     

Share This Page