Aluminum Heads

Discussion in 'Technical' started by MikeG747, Jan 29, 2006.

  1. MikeG747

    MikeG747 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,516
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick Grabber, 347 4V w/F-1X, 1974 Maverick Grabber 302 4V, 1974 Maverick Grabber 302 2V, 1971 Maverick Grabber 302 4V.
    That sounds pretty cool! I didn't know what a Gear Vendor was :huh: but I went to there web site & checked it out.(y)
     
  2. Thack

    Thack vision advicator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Moreno Valley Ca
    Vehicle:
    71 2 Dr Maverick, 70 Mustang Sportsroof, 77 F100 4x4, 72 maverick grabber wifes
    On my mustang I made just a head change and gained 38 RWHP. The old heads were 69 351w's and the new heads are edelbrock RPM's with 1.90 intakes. the engine is a 351w .060 overbore.

    Change to aluminum heads you won't be disapointed!
     
  3. tim keck

    tim keck truckdrivintrailertrash

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    sharps chapel,Tn
    Vehicle:
    '72 Comet, '75 Maverick, '85 F150 4x4 ,'93 F150,'75 F100,'77 Jeep Wagoneer,'91 Dodge D250 Cummins,'90 F150 xtra cab 4x4, '93 F150 4x4
    Why not an AOD?
     
  4. streetrod77

    streetrod77 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    100
    Location:
    Memphis,Tenn
    Vehicle:
    77 comet
    It takes away more of the power the engine makes than a C4.
     
  5. Grabber5.0

    Grabber5.0 Gear-head wannabe

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    127
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    Vehicle:
    71 Grabber
    You might talk to Shawn Simpson about the GearVendors thing. I was debating which way to go so I asked him about it (he has an AOD). He said he bought one, but it was so big it would not fit in the tranny tunnel without cutting and enlarging the tunnel, so he sent it back and bought an AOD (Lentech I believe). Just something to keep in mind.
     
  6. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    I suppose the size factor could be an issue.
    The AOD sounds like an odd tranny to me.
    They can't be shifted into 3rd, or out of O/D, depending on how you want to look at it.
    I also thought they were computer controlled. If so, you need to get a 'brain' to make it function correctly when installed in an older car.
    Art Carr makes 200R4s for SBFs. (GM's small v8 O/D)
    This tranny is smaller than the 'bulletproof' 700R4, and is much easier to retrofit into older or performance oriented cars. 5.0 guys are known to replace their AODs with 200R4s from Carr.
    Just another option.
    Dave
     
  7. MikeG747

    MikeG747 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,516
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick Grabber, 347 4V w/F-1X, 1974 Maverick Grabber 302 4V, 1974 Maverick Grabber 302 2V, 1971 Maverick Grabber 302 4V.
    Good idea Tim! What AOD do you recommend?
    Thanks,
     
  8. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,831
    Likes Received:
    685
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    AODEs are the electronic version, regular AODs can be shifted manually.
     
  9. Maverick Man

    Maverick Man The Original Maverick Man

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    Messages:
    3,559
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    137
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    Two 1973 LDO Mavericks (one 4 Drag one 4 driving like Mad on the roads :) ) also have a 75 6cyl Stock! Ok, well sort of Stock :P
    to me if you bought two heads one alum one cast iron with the same CCs and everything they are both gonna run be the same just that ones gonna be lighter then the other maybe 25lbs. if they are differant well of course they will run differant, however the question was iron or alum :p

    now if you change to an alum head (infact any aftermarket head) from a stock 289 / 302 / 351 head of course its gonna be better you can't compare old tech with the new they have now. also everything works together... if you dump a set of 62cc heads on a stock motor well yeah it might be a bit better but much better if you have the correct match up with everything... but i'm sure you know that already.

    so if you can afford it go with the alum heads and save the weight why not.... i mean the new motor i'm building will be alum heads.. but again i don't drive these cars everyday and i'm at the point where i want to lose some weight off the car.

    either way to me, if you drive the car everyday and you on a budget just get cast iron heads.

    i drove one of my cars everyday with ported 289 heads (and 3:55 gear i might add ;) ) on my car and it ran in the 13's all day long... yes i'm sure the car would have ran better with aftermarket heads but then again at the time i didn't have that kind of money... just a note that car still has the same set of heads on it. also my other car runs fine iron heads ;) see for yourself.

    http://maverickman.com/movieMaverickrun.mpg ;) (i'd right click and save to the desk top)
     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2006
  10. CACollo

    CACollo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    417
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Abq. NM
    Vehicle:
    1969.5 Maverick
    I don't think i'd ever go back to iron. There really aren't any reliability problems with the aluminum, they shave 25lbs off the nose, and if you ever want to get them ported, it's only 1/4 as much work.
    Unless you're going to just get a set of GT40P heads or E7's, spend the extra money on aluminum...you won't regret it!
     
  11. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    If price was a factor, which it was for me...I got a set of clean GT40Ps for $200. Did a couple hours of grinding off the smog bump and cleaning the exhaust ports a little, and popped them on.

    MUCH improvement! Like a totally different car. ONLY $200. By far, the BEST $200 I ever put into this car.
     
  12. tim keck

    tim keck truckdrivintrailertrash

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    sharps chapel,Tn
    Vehicle:
    '72 Comet, '75 Maverick, '85 F150 4x4 ,'93 F150,'75 F100,'77 Jeep Wagoneer,'91 Dodge D250 Cummins,'90 F150 xtra cab 4x4, '93 F150 4x4
    Get an AOD from just about any v8 ford,mustangs & crown vics your best bet.Stick with one from about '88-93,the 94-up is the AODE-it requires some electrical work.Sure they take more power than a c4,but I'm sure it's packaged much better in these cars than a Gear vendors unit.It may have been true at one time,but why in the @#$% would you pay extra $$ to put a weeny 200r4 GM tranny in a ford when there are 1000+hp mustangs with AOD's??You would probably be happy with an AOD and 4.10 gears and maybe a mild (2000 stall)coverter.
     
  13. 74merc

    74merc computer nerd

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    848
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Vehicle:
    1974 Comet
    The old AOD can manually shift 1, drive, Overdrive. There isn't a reliable method of making it hold out second gear. They can run without shifting into overdrive.

    Personally, similar to my plans, get the AFR 165 heads, Hooker 6901 headers (without the headers, the heads will make little difference), and if you're kicking for more, grab a set of 3.80s and an AOD from Lentech.

    I do agree, with the stock cam you'd be somewhat limiting the heads, but there will be a *signifigant* increase in power and milage by just bolting on the 165's and long tube headers.
     
  14. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    I knew there was a gear you couldn't control...
    I forgot which one. No manual control of 2nd gear is even worse IMO.
    Did they fix that before they computer controlled?
    There wasn't even a detent for 2nd on the tranny if memory serves.
    That's why they engineered the 200r swap.
     
  15. 74merc

    74merc computer nerd

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    848
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Vehicle:
    1974 Comet
    Wasn't fixed during production, but this way you could prevent going into OD and busting the input shaft, it would likely shift early into third. If you were WOT, then let off *just* before it hit OD, it would shift early and harder than average, so letting off of the power that would snap the OD input shaft would make it a more violent shift.

    Lentech and many others have valvebodies to fix this. I can't imagine the 200r being any better tho, those things are a dime a dozen out here, all of them broken. Kind of like the weekend dragster Mustangs with AOD's going to C4's, most of the locals swapped their 200r to a TH350.
     

Share This Page