Motor decision poll

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by 1970mavinator, Dec 22, 2006.

  1. Scootermagoo

    Scootermagoo Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Vehicle:
    1973 Ford Maverick Grabber ginger & white factory 302 c-4 car LDO package
    back in my high school dayz we took a 74-78 turbo 4 cobra mustang and popped the buttons off the mounts (frame) and the motor dropped right on the factory 4 shooter frame horns I would imagine the straight 6/v-6 mounts would be different but I have a feeling dropping the 2.3 onto the frame horns might not be to hard .. and consider they did it in brazil..:dance:
     
  2. wrenchingfords

    wrenchingfords Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Canada, Calgary AB
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick 2 dr, 302 76 F250 supercab 460 2004 F250 6.0 turbo diesel 2005 Mustang GT 4.6 5sp stock
    this is pretty off topic but a fellow wrencher and my self threw a 2.3 turbo motor into a 94 ranger he is running a massive front mount intercooler with a bunch of custom parts and i think he is making around 500+ hp at 25psi of boost, make ricers faces drop and not to mention other sites turboford.net is an ecellent site with a ton of turbo geniuses
     
  3. ATOMonkey

    ATOMonkey Adam

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Plainfield, Indiana
    Vehicle:
    '69 & 1/2 Maverick
    The only thing holding the 250 back is the head. If/when the new cross-flow head comes out that'll make all the difference. In the mean time, I'd go with the 2.3. You can always put the built 250 in there later.
     
  4. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    I'd love to see either a 250 turbo or 2.3 turbo Maverick...
    Either way.
    The 2.3 would probably be easier, but a Buick type turbo on a 250 sounds cool.
    The 2.3 could probably use a Buick style intercooler.
    Dave
     
  5. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    My bet would be the 250. It has more cubes and you can get around the problem of the head limitations in a couple of different ways.
    one way is to machine a flat spot over the existing carburetor mount to accept a flat plate mount for a 2bbl carburetor and bore the appropriate holes through for the carburetor to flow into the log manifold unrestricted.
    Another way is to use a "draw through" type of supercharger and bolt the pressure outlet directly to the log manifold at its current carburetor mount.
    If you wanted to you could mount the turbo from the 2.3 liter engine and use it to draw air / fuel through an appropriately sized carb and discharge it into your existing manifold.
    I believe you can still find the adjustable rockers from the 170 cu" engines and install a cam to assist in getting the mixture to the engine while using an exhaust by-pass to limit the boost to the engine. the 8.3:1 compression is ideal for supercharging but you would want to use forged pistons and good rings and bearings in the engine. Headers are not difficult to find for the Ford small sixes and a good dual exhaust with an "X" pipe installed after a 20 inch collector would serve you very well on the street.
    Paul
     
  6. gunslinger68

    gunslinger68 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    Jackson, WI
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick-347,tr3550,9in,etc.etc.
    I know of a few guys in the Northwoods Shelby club that have SVO's, and they run pretty hard, one of the cars was said to make 400 horses:huh: just what I've heard. They are pretty impressive for what they are, but those guys were usually under their hood after each session, 20 min on a road course is kinda hard on anything.

    It would be cool in a Maverick. Does anyone here have a 2.3 turbo in their cars??
     

Share This Page