Super or turbo?

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by ShuttleMav, Feb 27, 2007.

  1. ShuttleMav

    ShuttleMav Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I dunno if this would go into general or not, so oh well, but anyways...

    I'm planning on rebuilding my straight six because it was the original engine of my maverick, so I think it'd be neat. I have two options. I can purchase a magna supercharger from our fellow inline six parts dealer:bananaman , or I can buy used a couple of used turbo's and get a custom twin turbo system installed:dancing:. Which route would YOU go and why? You all exhibit such useful information, I'm excited to see what I receive... Thanks in advance...

    Scott
     
  2. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    i dont think ive ever seen a supered-ford six but the turbo setup has been done a few times with much sucess, i'd recomend picking up that new aluminum head if its out yet for either set up.
     
  3. Zooomzoomguy

    Zooomzoomguy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Detroit, MI
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick, 2 door
    tuuurbo, so much easier to make it more steatable
     
  4. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    I tend to like the supercharger. They tend to last longer and require less "fitting" than turbos do. A draw through system is nice because you just select your carb to fit the supercharger and go for it. (unlimited carb selection with the draw through because you aren't limited by the manifold.
     
  5. courier11sec

    courier11sec Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,589
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    117
    Location:
    Tucson, AZ
    Vehicle:
    '72 2d to hold my trailer down with.
    Really depends on your willingness and ability to make things happen.
    For me, A turbo set up on a sraight six would be less work than a supercharger on a straight six. I have easy access to a pipe bender and have experience building exhaust. I hate building brackets, so fitting a centrifugal supercharger would be a bummer to me. Same thing with building the parts to get a belt up to a roots type unit.
     
  6. ATOMonkey

    ATOMonkey Adam

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Plainfield, Indiana
    Vehicle:
    '69 & 1/2 Maverick
    Is that cross flow head done yet?
     
  7. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
    superchargers are boring to me. If you've ever driven a REAL turbocharged car, you'll find yourself thinking the same way.
     
  8. stmanser

    stmanser Looking for a Maverick

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,818
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Davenport, Iowa
    on a straight 6.. go turbo definetely

    and why get 1 when 2 is twice the fun.. and with having a 6 in there.. you have PLENTY of room for the twin setup
     
  9. ShuttleMav

    ShuttleMav Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    That's exactly what I was thinking! :thumbs2: I've really wanted to put twins on it all along, it's just that my brother tried convincing me that a supercharger would be better because you get more power, and I told him that a superchargers boost is linear, while a turbo's is exponential. That's why a lot of racers put supers in their cars, because the boost is constant, whereas with the turbo, the boost is immediate, but limited. I've personally thought turbo's were for street, and supers were for strip, but that's just me...
     
  10. camcojb

    camcojb Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Wilton, Ca.
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick

    I haven't seen any blower beat the correct sized turbo in power at equal boost. Yes, the blower may make more boost sooner in some cases but at a certain boost, say 12 psi, the turbo will make more power.

    I love blowers, have had (2) 6-71's, factory Eaton and KB screw blower in addition to (4) centrifugals. But the turbos are more efficient. The Lightning guys are swapping to turbo(s). I installed a T76 on a friends built KB/Lightning. At the same boost level and with no other changes he went from 580 rwhp to over 700 rwhp.

    I am also considering a turbo 6 for mine as a sleeper build, but haven't done near enough research to even know which engine to use for the build, parts like heads, etc.

    Jody
     
  11. Zooomzoomguy

    Zooomzoomguy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Detroit, MI
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick, 2 door
    well i know i'm gonna get hit for this, but i drive a turboed import as my daily driver, and it is a blast :p

    one thing to remember about superchargers, it takes some power to make power, while turbo's run off the exhaust.
     
  12. 74bossmav

    74bossmav Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    23
    Location:
    Illinois Machesney Park
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick 2 door Brn.
    Boost builds much quicker with properly sized turbo's because you can load the motor against the brake forcing exhaust out to drive the compresser or just raise the rpm's to do the same thing. With a supercharger you can try all those things and you will still not get boost any quicker because the level of boost is directly related to rpm. Generally, superchargers make more torque at low rpm's so that is a plus. I think it would be much easier to turbo that six. Like the earlier post--- much less/easier fabrication.
     
  13. ShuttleMav

    ShuttleMav Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    To be honest, I WOULD make fun of you, because I HATE asian cars, but I've started a thread that grew into an argument of knockin' people for what they enjoy, so I say, if you like it, ride it, that's why I ride my mavey!:yahoo: And as far as your second comment, you're partly true. A turbocharger will still take power away from the engine, because it restricts the exhaust's flow, but it isn't nearly as much power lost as with a supercharger.
     
  14. 302mav76

    302mav76 Isaac Serna

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    602
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    92
    Location:
    Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick
    Have you heard about sequential turbos?

    Install 2 turbos, a small and a big one. The small will boost quickly, with much less lag, and then the big one will react with the previous power. The acceleration slope would be insane!!! At least that's what I think...
     
  15. ShuttleMav

    ShuttleMav Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah, there's sequential, and compound. I think compound makes more sense, and it's what I want to do with my six...
     
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2007

Share This Page