O.K. Who has a 351 Mod?

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by ShuttleMav, Aug 27, 2007.

  1. ShuttleMav

    ShuttleMav Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My dad can get me a 351 Mod, but we need to know what exactly I'd need to do to the ol' Mav to make it fit... Who's got one and can tell me what they did? Thanks a lot, guys!
     
  2. Hawkco

    Hawkco Genuine Car Nut

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    5,281
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    135
    Location:
    Rex, Georgia (GA)
    Vehicle:
    77 Maverick
    Putting a 351M (Modified) in a Maverick is going to be about the same as putting in a 351C (Cleveland). Do a search for 351 Cleveland.

    If I my throw my opinion in here, the the 351M is a dog. Building one of these for a Maverick is almost a waste of time and money. You will be much, much better off with a 302 stroker ( by far and away the easiest swap for a Maverick) or a 351W (Windsor - stroked up to a 427 if you want). If I was not going to use a 302 or 351W, I'd use a 351C. I would never use a 351M. Ever.

    Do a search for 351w Swap.
     
  3. vern

    vern Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Messages:
    126
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Vehicle:
    1970
    Have to agree with hawko the modified was junk.....

    Stoke out a 302 and have fun more than enough for our cars unless you are going to the track to run brackets with the car....
     
  4. don graham

    don graham MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,800
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    302
    Location:
    arizona city, az.
    Vehicle:
    70 mav, 71 grabber, 73 Comet, 2004 f-250 crew cab diesel, 2001 f-250, 2004 explorer, 2007 Gold Wing trike.
    351m is best used on the end of a long chain. most people call it an anchor.:)
     
  5. wardf

    wardf Ward Frahler

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,964
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    146
    Location:
    Elizabethtown, Ky.
    Vehicle:
    70 maverick
    Besides being a dog, (and they can be made to run with enough money but why spend that much on one of them when probably half that money could make a 302 run better than that), they (351M's) have a C-6 (or a big) bellhousing bolt pattern. There is not any room for a C-6 without tunnel mods, well maybe but it is tight. The whole process just gets harder trying to go this route. IMO, not worth it.
     
  6. ShuttleMav

    ShuttleMav Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah, I understand that the mod is a waste, but I'd be getting it for free... But good to know that It'd take a lot of mod to the car first, helps make my decision a WHOLE lot easier.... Thanks again, guys!
     
  7. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    i think someone else had posted on here at one time that there too wide to fit between the shock towers, but i wouldnt know. from what ive read they sound like a waste of time but either way good luck
     
  8. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
    Yep...the 351M and 400 are the same width as a 460. They aren't quite as tall and slightly shorter lengthwise, only about 75 lbs lighter and they never made more than 150 HP. In fact, a 351M and 400 use the same deck height within .030" as a 460. It'll fit in a Maverick but you'll have to lose the shock towers completely, build your own headers, use a C6 transmission (which eats up about 65 HP), have a driveshaft made, fab motor mounts....

    It's free for a reason. Nobody else would pay anything for it. Usually when someone asks me if I want a 351M or 400 (same engine, but the 400 is obviously 51 cubic inches bigger..it's actually 402") my response is "yeah I'll take $50 for it"...meaning youd have to PAY me $50 to take the stupid thing! 400's have potential. Luckily the 351M and 400 are the same block...you just pick up a 400 crank and pistons and it goes right in. Then pick up a pair of CHI heads and their matching intake manifold and 500 HP would be an easy task. But building a 408" windsor that screws onto the same mounts as a 302 and can be made to fit EASIER, and make the same power (if not more) makes more sense.

    But as I mentioned, they are the exact same width as a 460, use the same transmission...so wouldn't it make more sense to put a 460 in there if you have to do all that work to make a 400 fit?

    Now I'm not saying that it cant' be done...but just do the homework before you spend a bunch of time cutting it up to make a dump truck engine fit.
     
  9. Jamie Miles

    Jamie Miles the road warrior

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    383
    Location:
    Lawrenceville, GA
    Vehicle:
    13 Mavericks
    My grandpa has a '78 Bronco XLT with a 351M. Junk, Junk, Junk... No way I would put one in a Maverick. They do sound cool with straight pipes and the choke half out to make it lope, though. :rolleyes:
     
  10. Hawkco

    Hawkco Genuine Car Nut

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    5,281
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    135
    Location:
    Rex, Georgia (GA)
    Vehicle:
    77 Maverick
    The Bronco guys love building the 400's. They build them to make great torque for hill and rock climbing - ala a truck engine for pulling not running at speed. But, don't put one in a Maverick.
     
  11. dkstuck

    dkstuck Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2004
    Messages:
    3,249
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Location:
    Latrobe Pa (Pgh)
    Vehicle:
    72 Maverick in drag
    I got a 400,,,real dyno at 390+ horse. They are getting better known, with more parts out an coming. Nice engines if you get over the old ways of the stock engines!

    I would not put this in a Maverick! Currently have in a 78 4x4 short bed. Smokes tire more then most cars!. Only one year will take the smaller tranny bolt pattern, if you have that (73, you'll see dual lines for both trannys, small is drilled out) Sell it for a GREAT buck an build you a 302 or a 351w.

    As all the above said,,, TOO much work an most is hand fab! Even if I hit the Mega millions,,, I wouldn't do it! Good Luck an keep us posted!
     
  12. Old Guy

    Old Guy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,291
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    95
    I have just finished building a 400 for my son, who is in Iraq. Put it in a 78 two wheel drive. Has Wiend intake, Holley, Comp Hyd. cam and roller rockers etc. Because of the deck hieght being so extreme, he found a place in Minn. who makes special pistons for KB that uses stock rods and brings them to zero deck. Using stock 2 barrel cleveland heads and coated Hedman headers. Fired it up a week ago and it has great throttle response and matching torque too. Have a few issues to resolve with small details(always are time consuming) but will road test it soon. Got a feeling that when he drives it back to Ft. Carson in Jan., he will need a fuel truck to follow him with gallons of premium gas. Am anxious to see how it compares to a windsor, not to much more exspense to build it compared to the W. Would never try to put one in a Mav though, lot's of weight with the c6.
     
  13. dkstuck

    dkstuck Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2004
    Messages:
    3,249
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Location:
    Latrobe Pa (Pgh)
    Vehicle:
    72 Maverick in drag
    http://www.tmeyerinc.com/

    Here is where your son, God Bless an Thank You (Family) and Son for the sacrifice,, got the 400 parts. Tim is a great guy to deal with an can make some power on the 400! I bought his project 400. Was going to rebuild my similar 400, just worked out better for his! What all did you get from Tim?

    Your son keeps his foot out of it and you'll be surprised on gas mileage
     
  14. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    The problem with the 351m/400 is the relatively small cubes for the relatively massive weight.
    If you keep it around 400 to 430 cubes, you can get the same cid/power from a stroked 351w, and it will weigh a great deal less. Remember weight lost is horsepower gained in effect.
    If you want more cubes that that, you can go 460 for the same money (or less because I don't know of any stroker stuff for Modified), and have the extra power with the same tranny and weight.
    The 400 is an engine with potential, but there are too many compromises to make it worthwhile.
    The 351m is just a joke. Massive weight gain for same cubes as Windsor or Cleveland.
    I have heard it called "hermaphrodite" in the old days.
     
  15. Andysutt

    Andysutt '72 Comet GT

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Conway Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT
    Well.... if you know his son like I do... he'll run out of gas before he gets out of town... lol Atleast til he gets the "new" wore off of it.

    He has bought some quality parts for the ole 400 and should run pretty good Im thinking.

    As far as putting it in a maverick... its not the best bet honestly.

    Had one in a 80's F-150 4x4 and it ran pretty good for what it was.

    Decent motors, just not what most people would want for a maverick.
     

Share This Page