255 V-8 Swap??

Discussion in 'Technical' started by Maverick6714, Oct 16, 2007.

  1. don graham

    don graham MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,800
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    302
    Location:
    arizona city, az.
    Vehicle:
    70 mav, 71 grabber, 73 Comet, 2004 f-250 crew cab diesel, 2001 f-250, 2004 explorer, 2007 Gold Wing trike.
    how much hp can you afford.:pnowadays, the skys the limit with a 302. stroke it to 347, spray it a little, turbo, supercharge. or just keep it stock with a few bolt ons. like a new cam, intake, carb, heads, headers and be in the 325+ range for not a lot of money.:)
     
  2. Maverick6714

    Maverick6714 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northeast PA
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick, 2004 Dodge Dakota Quad Cab, 1987 Ford Bronco
    So I guess now I just have to find a 302...
     
  3. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
    none. 255's were like 100 hp tops....on a good day!
     
  4. Maverick6714

    Maverick6714 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northeast PA
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick, 2004 Dodge Dakota Quad Cab, 1987 Ford Bronco

    Ouch!!
     
  5. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    guess i wont be suprised. it would still be alot faster then the 200 because of more low end tq
     
  6. Maverick6714

    Maverick6714 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northeast PA
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick, 2004 Dodge Dakota Quad Cab, 1987 Ford Bronco
    Well my search for a 302 has begun so I can avoid all of the small horsepower stuff.
    :chirp:
     
  7. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    good luck

    just make sure you do your home work before you drop any money.
     
  8. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    The 255 was a two year only TURD. Small bores, weaker 3.00 stroke crank (it's hollow, maybe you can blow thru it and play a tune ? ):biglaugh:The heads had small ports, small valves, there's nothing you can do to make it faster, other than maybe dropping it out the rear of a C130 at altitude. :thumbs2: You're better off with the 6 banger. :rofl2:GM's 262 was around longer than that. I recall one in a friend's 73-74 Oldsmobile. And my wife's grandma had a Monza with it.
     
  9. Jamie Miles

    Jamie Miles the road warrior

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    383
    Location:
    Lawrenceville, GA
    Vehicle:
    13 Mavericks
    You are better off with a 200 then a 255 any day of the week. I drove an old Mustang with a 255 in it a few years ago, total junk. I personally loved my 200 when I was driving my '69.5 daily. It ran with traffic just fine around town, would run 80+ on the interstate without a problem, and got better gas mileage then my 250 by a good margin, though I never figured up the exact difference.
     
  10. Sopp

    Sopp Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Eau Claire, WI
    Vehicle:
    1976 Comet 4 door, 1972 Comet 2 door
    Ah come on guys. Don't pick on the poor little 255. I have one in my Morris Minor and I can completely bury the entire car with tire smoke. AOD, 3.90 locked gears, and a 600 Holley and it's absolutely wicked to drive. Never took it down the strip, but...............maybe next year. Any engine can be made to perform, some just take a little more work.
     
  11. RabidCustoms

    RabidCustoms sic minds demand sic toys

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,394
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    117
    a briggs and stratton would move one of those along nicely.:D
    your power to weight ratio even with the "questionable 255" is still light years ahead of the mav with the same engine .
     
  12. 69GT

    69GT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    60
    Location:
    Fresno
    Vehicle:
    72 Grabber Maverick.
    The 255 is garbage. It made 111- 117 HP at the flywheel depending on the year. If you are running an automatic you're looking at about 80-90 HP at the wheels. Probably less. For perspective sake. An 85 5.0 (Last of the 4 barrel carbed motors) made about 180-185 at the ground. And they are more abundant in junk yards. Dont do the 255! Please!!!! If I ever see another one I'm gonna tie it to a Pontiac 301 and sink it in a lake!
     
  13. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    What in hell's a Morris Minor ? :hmmm:
     
  14. Andysutt

    Andysutt '72 Comet GT

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Conway Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT
    If your current motor is worn out, and the 255 runs fine... do the swap.
    It gets you ready for a 302 swap, and a more reliable motor.

    Otherwise, Id save up for a 302, even a junkyard one thats running.
    Just check it out, and re-ring,bearing it and go on your way.
     
  15. Maverick6714

    Maverick6714 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northeast PA
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick, 2004 Dodge Dakota Quad Cab, 1987 Ford Bronco
    Thanks guys. I am not going to mess with the 255. I am going to continue to work on the body and interior of the car while I find a 302. This car is not going to be a daily driver, so fuel mileage and staying with traffic means nothing. If anything I want to be able to fly by traffic. This car is going to be more of a weekend warrior car. Alll of your advice was very helpful. Thanks again.
     

Share This Page