anyone ever tried a 3.0 yamaha in a sho?

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by Threemav, Mar 21, 2008.

  1. Threemav

    Threemav Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    georgia
    Vehicle:
    69 mav pieced together from 2 73 mavs and a 73 grabber
    anyone ever tried a 3.0 yamaha in a maverick?

    err i mean from a sho,,


    A idiot crashed into my 80 tuarus sho and totaled it. Im thinking this engine would rock in my 73 grabber that i have left over from the last maverick run.
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2008
  2. Jamie Miles

    Jamie Miles the road warrior

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    383
    Location:
    Lawrenceville, GA
    Vehicle:
    13 Mavericks
    I've thought about it. Lot of work. You'll probably have to do a Mustang II front end. No such thing as an '80 Taurus.
     
  3. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
    They're only 225 HP. Not really a hotrod to me, as compared to a 350+ HP small block. Complicated and expensive to repair as well. Common problems include cam cover leaks (look for oil in the spark plug holes) and IIRC, cam sprockets coming loose (but the sprocket issue may have been the SHO V8)

    But they're neat engines that will scream if they're modded! I seem to remember someone mentioning that if the engine accessories were able to withstand the speed, the engine itself would make power up to about 10,000 RPM. Doesn't surprise me to be honest, especially knowing how their higher performance 4 stroke engines are built.

    Friend of mine had a '93 SHO. Cool car. Kind of a sport sedan. The engine was a masterpiece. VERY smooth running but the AXOD transaxle (I believe that is what is was called) was a piece of junk to say the least. And the car itself fell apart.

    I think that a turbo 4 cylinder would be a more fun, easier to do swap. Or maybe even a Duratec V6. But the wiring/engine control system would be a bear!
     
  4. Threemav

    Threemav Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    georgia
    Vehicle:
    69 mav pieced together from 2 73 mavs and a 73 grabber
    I ment 89 sho. Realy think i want to try this...but not shure yet.
     
  5. littleredtoy

    littleredtoy Seth

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,050
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Location:
    North Carolina, Triangle Area
    Vehicle:
    '74 Comet GT
    Aerostar bellhousing lets it mate to a T-5.
    I saw pics of one in some little foreign 2 seat job.
    With massaging and reprogramming they are
    good for 300 HP.

    I had a '94 SHO. Best smooth running engine
    I have ever had. All the FORD accessories-A/C,
    P/S sucked!

    Seth
     
  6. Threemav

    Threemav Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    georgia
    Vehicle:
    69 mav pieced together from 2 73 mavs and a 73 grabber
    yeah i loved my sho, realy makes me mad that some rich bitch ran into it because she wasnt paying attention.
     
  7. tim keck

    tim keck truckdrivintrailertrash

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    sharps chapel,Tn
    Vehicle:
    '72 Comet, '75 Maverick, '85 F150 4x4 ,'93 F150,'75 F100,'77 Jeep Wagoneer,'91 Dodge D250 Cummins,'90 F150 xtra cab 4x4, '93 F150 4x4
    I had a '92 SHO/5spd car.Very nice car,developed electrical gremlins that no one could figure out,traded it for an '80 Malibu w/buckets,console,350 & rallies and 2k cash.Vowed to never have another SHO,it's a shame-the car was faster than most pre 93 f-bodies,faster than the 96-98 4.6 gts and got 25-28 mpg no matter how you drove it.Just too much technology for me.
     
  8. Thack

    Thack vision advicator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Moreno Valley Ca
    Vehicle:
    71 2 Dr Maverick, 70 Mustang Sportsroof, 77 F100 4x4, 72 maverick grabber wifes
    There is alot of info out there on the web. one of them is .375 spacers on the intake runners to turn it around so it faces forward. I looked at this swap when radmav talked about it. The weight of the engine kept me away (same as a 302) but gas prices today would probably push me to it.

    I say do it
     
  9. Threemav

    Threemav Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    georgia
    Vehicle:
    69 mav pieced together from 2 73 mavs and a 73 grabber
    I think i will, im looking into all the parts to do it right, still waiting on the insurance adjuster to come look at the car and total it out. In the mean time im draging all the old parts out i collected when i was in the game years ago. I still have my grabbers original gas cap :) (no gas tank though).

    The sho was alot of fun. I just finished the 60k maitnence and it was a bear, taking a good 8 hours but the car was fun, as i beleave the mav is going to be.
     
  10. starsky74

    starsky74 Technician

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2007
    Messages:
    904
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    107
    Location:
    Hackberry Louisiana
    Vehicle:
    73 four door, 74 starsky&hutch mav, a 93SHO, an 03 gt, and a 94 gt
     

Share This Page