engine question

Discussion in 'Technical' started by ddraper1110, Sep 16, 2009.

  1. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    Ummm n2o, turbochargers and superchargers?
     
  2. FishnRace

    FishnRace Jamie

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Solomon's Island, Maryland
    Vehicle:
    '72 2dr 351
    More HP ...
    Blown 302/347 or Blown 351/408?
    Turbo 302/347 or turbo 351/408?
    etc., etc., etc.

    All those power adders reduce reliability where as a windsor upgrade is essentially as reliable as a 302.

    I'm assume(don't have the numbers!) a naturally aspirated 393 is an appreciably cheaper build then a turbo or supercharged 302.

    NO2 setup is cheap intially, but NO2 isn't free, and you still need a stout bottom end or you won't have fun for long, and you need to fill the bottle, and general only used for racing. Which is fine, I'm just point this factor out.

    So, I'll say YES I agree the all replace the horse power (and then some depending on the details) but still are not a complete replacement for cheap, reliable, gruntin', pullin', good old fashioned displacement:thumbs2:
     
  3. justin has a 74

    justin has a 74 Maverick bandit official

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    kentucky
    Vehicle:
    74 maverick /71 grabber /72 maverick

    but so much cooler:tiphat::biglaugh:
     
  4. FishnRace

    FishnRace Jamie

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Solomon's Island, Maryland
    Vehicle:
    '72 2dr 351
    Then a blown 427 Windsor is the coolest:dancing:
     
  5. Gone'70

    Gone'70 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Copperas Cove, TX
    Vehicle:
    70 MAverick, totaled 8 years ago!! + Dads '73 MAverick
    What was the original budget for this build??? Because I think I can see things starting to snowball, and the build taking much longer to complete!!!
     
  6. 69GT

    69GT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    60
    Location:
    Fresno
    Vehicle:
    72 Grabber Maverick.
    I would put in the engine that fit (302-331-347) then if that's not enough apply a little boost later. Of course that depends on budget.
     
  7. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    There are several that fit...:huh:
    Not just the 302.
    Some just fit tighter than others.
    If you want a bunch of room, put in a 200.
    If you want a bunch of power, put in a 408w or c.
     
  8. Blown 5.0

    Blown 5.0 Hooked on BOOST MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2004
    Messages:
    784
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    MS.
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick
    Hey guys, Have your cake and eat it to. The Man-O-War 8.2 deck block can be stroked and bored past 400 ci.
     
  9. FishnRace

    FishnRace Jamie

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Solomon's Island, Maryland
    Vehicle:
    '72 2dr 351
    That's a big hit on the piggy bank:(
     
  10. 69GT

    69GT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    60
    Location:
    Fresno
    Vehicle:
    72 Grabber Maverick.
    I am assuming that he meant V8 since he didn't mention the sixes. I was referring to the fact that the 331- 347 is a direct, easy drop in with no shock tower/ header/ spark plug access issues. And should easily make all the power you need to run easy 12s or 11s with the right parts. That is a bunch of power.

    Not dissing the 351s. I have a Cleveland. They are great.
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2009
  11. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    (y)
    It was nothing personal.
    I was just stirring the pot, so to speak!:stirthepot:
    I do that alot around here.
    Some folks 'get it', and some folks take me too seriously.
     
  12. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    :drool: Oh yeah! I love those things.
    Wish I could afford one.

    8.2" deck with Windsor pan rails so you don't have to worry about clearances. It has to use a 351w oil pan, distributor, and oil pump. Add the option of siamese bores and you can run 4.125"+ bore!

    However, I believe the 9.5" siamese block is not much more money!:yup:
    I mean if you have enough for the 8.2", then the 9.5" is only relative pennies more. Then you can get within spitting distance of 500 cubes, if you're brave.
     
  13. tim keck

    tim keck truckdrivintrailertrash

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    sharps chapel,Tn
    Vehicle:
    '72 Comet, '75 Maverick, '85 F150 4x4 ,'93 F150,'75 F100,'77 Jeep Wagoneer,'91 Dodge D250 Cummins,'90 F150 xtra cab 4x4, '93 F150 4x4
    A 351 will run better stock, and will run better in a milder configuration simply due to more cubes= more torque. All things equal, bigger motor wins. BUT-the 351 will need high $ headers to perform well. And 351 parts(intakes/rods/pistons)are a bit harder to find used than 302 stuff. The 351 is a tight fit though. You'll need a remote oil filter,or use a shorter one for a 318 Dodge.
    A well thought out 302 will run good, is easier to package and used parts are almost as common as 350 Chevy stuff;).
    If you're on a dirtball budget, a good running, stock exhaust manifolded 351 is the best bang for the buck. It'll be a tire burner even with a 2 barrel:burnout:. If you got cash to work with, I'd look for a roller cammed 302, sprinkle some speed parts at it(intake/4 barrel/headers,etc)and go from there. It'll be much easier to put in, work on, and is a bit lighter so you can at least outcorner a dump truck:clap:. Have fun.
     
  14. 69GT

    69GT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    60
    Location:
    Fresno
    Vehicle:
    72 Grabber Maverick.
    :dancing:Hey what about the 9.2 block? A bit more clearance and since we have no budget.....
     
  15. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    Not enough choices in intakes IMO.
    Same with the 8.7"...
    If you want to run something other than a Victor, you're more or less skrewed.
     

Share This Page