Four cylinders...

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by DarthMaverick, Jul 30, 2004.

  1. DarthMaverick

    DarthMaverick The Yang of Mavericks

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bakersfield
    Vehicle:
    1976 2 door Maverick
    If I put a four-banger out of a Ranger and supercharged it would I get kicked off the Forum. How about if I showed with it at a Round-up? Green pastel paint. 20 inch rims. Lambo doors and a four cylinder. I think that would be awesome myself.
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2004
  2. riporter

    riporter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,474
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Charleston S.C.
    Vehicle:
    70 Maverick 2 dr. modified street cruiser, 72 Comet tube chassis drag car
    I say it's your car and do what you want with it...if done tastefully it might be pretty cool.
     
  3. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,583
    Likes Received:
    2,933
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    i'm looking at a 69.5 mav. with a v6 from a mustang II in it. the car is in great shape. he is asking $300 for it. i have 3 mavs. now and don't need another but the v6 is tempting...frank...:bananaman :bananaman
     
  4. Maxx Levell

    Maxx Levell Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    107
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Henderson, KY
    Vehicle:
    1972 Mav 2 dr, 1971 Mav 2 dr...thanks Old Guy!
    There was a guy at our local dragstrip last year that had a late-model Mustang with a turbo'd 4 in it that ran like a scalded ape! He was running low 7's in the eighth mile. Don't know the $ amount he had in it, but it was definitely a low-buck attempt. I talked to the guy some and he said he was just doing it to see if he could. He was using boneyard stuff, definitely not any high-dollar top shelf items. I really enjoyed talking to him. In fact, I like talking to just about all guys like him. You know the ones...the guys who get something in their heads, and just do it with what they have available. Mad Scientist types. They typically can't wait to talk to you about their project, and show you what they've done!

    Kind of reminds me of a lot of the guys at the RoundUp!

    PS...I haven't seen the guy around this year. If I do, I'll get an e-mail address or something.


    Later,
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2004
  5. Maxx Levell

    Maxx Levell Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    107
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Henderson, KY
    Vehicle:
    1972 Mav 2 dr, 1971 Mav 2 dr...thanks Old Guy!
    I've thought about the V-6 swap also. I had a line a while back on a '96 Mustang with the FI V-6 with a price that was almost too good to pass up. Thought about buying it and giving it a try. Talked myself out of it at the last minute! I got cold feet when I started thinking about the wiring! Also wondered if I could get headers to fit without hitting anything.

    As light as our cars are, it would have to be a decent ride, with the benefit of outstanding mileage! Who knows...maybe someday.

    Later,
     
  6. Dan Starnes

    Dan Starnes Original owner

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    5,235
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    146
    Location:
    West Central IL
    Vehicle:
    Stallion, 72 Grabber, Sprint, 77 4dr Maverick
    Ford built T-birds in a form something like you are stating, close kinda. Guess if a Mav were like that you could call it a Superbull or sumthin. Actually it sounds pretty cool. As long as it is Ford powered it stays cool in my book.
    Dan
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2004
  7. Dan Starnes

    Dan Starnes Original owner

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    5,235
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    146
    Location:
    West Central IL
    Vehicle:
    Stallion, 72 Grabber, Sprint, 77 4dr Maverick
    In fact, I like talking to just about all guys like him. You know the ones...the guys who get something in their heads, and just do it with what they have available. Mad Scientist types. They typically can't wait to talk to you about their project, and show you what they've done!

    Kind of reminds me of a lot of the guys at the RoundUp!


    Oh yeah?? you just wait till I get out of my laboratory,, I'll fix you :smash:

    Dan
     
  8. Maxx Levell

    Maxx Levell Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    107
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Henderson, KY
    Vehicle:
    1972 Mav 2 dr, 1971 Mav 2 dr...thanks Old Guy!
    Now Now Dan...I'm a Mad Scientist myself!! That's why I like 'em so much!

    Now If I could just park over there....(y) (y)

    I'm thinking about changing my screen name to Smooth Criminal !!:bananaman :bananaman

    Later
     
  9. DarthMaverick

    DarthMaverick The Yang of Mavericks

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bakersfield
    Vehicle:
    1976 2 door Maverick
    Wow. I was just trying to tick people off. I was thinking actaully about the 4.0L V6 out of the Ranger not the four cylinder. For the weight a v6 is plenty. I not into the "no replacement for displacement" thing. A well-matched engine to the weight of the car. And no heavy front end-bias with the v-8.
     
  10. jeremy

    jeremy I build t5's

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Location:
    Corona, Ca
    Vehicle:
    1972 2 door 302 maverick, 1986 5.0 stang gt convertible,66 mustang coupe, HEMI ram
    The 2.3T is actually a very high maintance powerplant, you wouldn't want to go that path anyhow, although the mav is probably lighter than a fox body mustang if anything.

    I applaud anyone who wants to do something different with their mavericks. IMO, though the weight bias of a v8 vs a six is not a big enough difference to not choose a v8.

    don't get so caught up trying to do something different that you spend all your hard earned cash on something in the end that may still not perform to what you really want. Just my .02
     
  11. DarthMaverick

    DarthMaverick The Yang of Mavericks

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bakersfield
    Vehicle:
    1976 2 door Maverick
    What are you smoking...

    There is no big weight difference between a v-6 and v-8? Come on. Think about what you just said. There is about a 150 lbs weight difference. On the nose of car this makes a huge difference. If I have a v-6 making as much power as a small-block v-8 then that would be 150lbs less than what my car needs to transfer when I hit the gas.
     
  12. teecee

    teecee Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2004
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Missouri
    Vehicle:
    1973 Comet,1930 Ford Model A truck,1976 Eldorado convertible
    problem with your statement is that it takes much more bucks to make a V6 produce more power than a low budget V8:cool:
     
  13. jeremy

    jeremy I build t5's

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Location:
    Corona, Ca
    Vehicle:
    1972 2 door 302 maverick, 1986 5.0 stang gt convertible,66 mustang coupe, HEMI ram
    Exactly, and when you think what it's going to take to get that 6 to perform anything like a stout v8, 150 pound difference is nothing. Especially when you've got a good suspension on the car that can handle the v8.
     
  14. DarthMaverick

    DarthMaverick The Yang of Mavericks

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bakersfield
    Vehicle:
    1976 2 door Maverick
    Blowers...

    In conjunction with EFI will make 300 hp and still get great gas mileage. I'm not a v-8 guy and big blocks are boat anchors compared with todays technology. Big blocks in trucks = ok. big blocks in hipo cars = overkill. Unless it's a 427 Saleen F7. But that's a FE engine, not a big block.
     
  15. jeremy

    jeremy I build t5's

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Location:
    Corona, Ca
    Vehicle:
    1972 2 door 302 maverick, 1986 5.0 stang gt convertible,66 mustang coupe, HEMI ram
    i haven't seen too many 300 hp 4.0's running around. I'm sure it's more than possible. It sounds like a lot of fun, truthefully, if you've got that in your budget, as like I said, I love people who tastefully mod their cars in different ways.

    I'll stick to my smallblock v8's though. COnvert to manual steering, ditch the a'c, use aluminum heads, and you've overcome most of the weight bias. pulling 300 horse out of a roller 5.0 engine is as easy as anything, however pulling 300 horse out of a 4.0 will take a lot more money
     

Share This Page