Hooker headers & Lakewood bell housing

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by Shorty, Oct 15, 2012.

  1. Shorty

    Shorty Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    221
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Lafayette, In
    Vehicle:
    '72 Maverick, 347 c.i., w/ dual quads, TKO 600 5-speed transmission, back halved w/ 4-link, '16 F150, 5.0 Coyotte, regular cab, shortbed, lowered 3/5 & 1-owner '79 Trans Am.
    I'm in the process of installing a Top Loader four speed in place of a C-4 behind the stock 302 and was wondering if anyone has had experience with the combination of Hooker 6901 headers and a Lakewood 15200 bell housing? I've read that there is a little interference and wanted to know where. If so how difficult is it to clearance the housing?

    Thanks,
    Bruce
     
  2. Bryant

    Bryant forgot more than learned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,538
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    71 Maverick
    on a different car that i used the lakewood bell housing on, the long tubes hit the bell housing around the starter motor area.
    im interested in this because i plan on putting one in my car when i get to that point.
     
  3. maverick1970

    maverick1970 MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    7,372
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    242
    Location:
    Missouri
    Vehicle:
    69 1/2, 70 Maverick and 71 Grabber
    When I had the toploader in my car, I ran Blackjack headers and they hit the Lakewood Bellhousing in the starter motor area as Bryant indicated. Never tried with the Hooker headers.
     
  4. Shorty

    Shorty Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    221
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Lafayette, In
    Vehicle:
    '72 Maverick, 347 c.i., w/ dual quads, TKO 600 5-speed transmission, back halved w/ 4-link, '16 F150, 5.0 Coyotte, regular cab, shortbed, lowered 3/5 & 1-owner '79 Trans Am.
    Thanks I'll keep you posted with pictures. I hope to have it all together by next week. Also I have an ancient sets of Black Jack headers from my first Maverick hanging on the wall of my garage and their design is very similar to the Hookers.

    Bruce
     
  5. John Holden

    John Holden Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    NJ
    My blackjacks in my 75 hit the lakewood in the starter area as well as the drivers side. You will find that there is alot of "excess metal" all the way around the bellhousing.
     
  6. Shorty

    Shorty Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    221
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Lafayette, In
    Vehicle:
    '72 Maverick, 347 c.i., w/ dual quads, TKO 600 5-speed transmission, back halved w/ 4-link, '16 F150, 5.0 Coyotte, regular cab, shortbed, lowered 3/5 & 1-owner '79 Trans Am.
    Thanks, John, is that metal difficult to trim back? What do you recommend I use to cut it with? It is high strength steel isn't it?

    Bruce
     
  7. John Holden

    John Holden Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    NJ
    A 4" angle grinder should do the trick. It's thick.
     
  8. maverick1970

    maverick1970 MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    7,372
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    242
    Location:
    Missouri
    Vehicle:
    69 1/2, 70 Maverick and 71 Grabber
    I used a Dremel to clearance mine.
     
  9. fordride

    fordride Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    granby qc canada
    Vehicle:
    72 grabber !, 63 ford country sedan, 70 maverick 6 cyl 250
    mine !

    i cut little on bellhousing because dont want to modified the headers,,, was fine,,,before restore my car I make sure every thing was ok
     

    Attached Files:

    • 223.jpg
      223.jpg
      File size:
      592.3 KB
      Views:
      43
  10. Shorty

    Shorty Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    221
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Lafayette, In
    Vehicle:
    '72 Maverick, 347 c.i., w/ dual quads, TKO 600 5-speed transmission, back halved w/ 4-link, '16 F150, 5.0 Coyotte, regular cab, shortbed, lowered 3/5 & 1-owner '79 Trans Am.
    Okay the bell housing and headers are co-inhabiting at this time. We ended up trimming the block plate and the bell housing flange to clear the headers and the external slave cylinder. I burned up my 4" grinder in the process but sacrifices had to be made! I've got to find a solid stand for my dial indicator and buy the adjustable dowel kit yet. A little touch up paint won't hurt either. Here's a picture of the driver's side including the slave cylinder.

    Bruce
     

    Attached Files:

  11. John Holden

    John Holden Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    NJ
    Yeah that looks familiar! What kind of hydraulic clutch setup are you using?
     
  12. Shorty

    Shorty Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    221
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Lafayette, In
    Vehicle:
    '72 Maverick, 347 c.i., w/ dual quads, TKO 600 5-speed transmission, back halved w/ 4-link, '16 F150, 5.0 Coyotte, regular cab, shortbed, lowered 3/5 & 1-owner '79 Trans Am.
    I bought the slave cylinder with the bell housing modified for it from Mike Forte's Parts Connection ( www.fortesparts.com ) Previously I had purchased an entire hydraulic set up (master, slave and braided steel line from Extreme Custom Parts ( www.extremecustomparts.com ) but soon learned that the slave wasn't going to fit in the very limited space available.

    Bruce
     
  13. John Holden

    John Holden Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    NJ
    That's interesting. The first setup was a concentric bearing type? I forget what trans you're using but I'm surprised it wouldn't fit in the bellhousing.
     
  14. Shorty

    Shorty Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    221
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Lafayette, In
    Vehicle:
    '72 Maverick, 347 c.i., w/ dual quads, TKO 600 5-speed transmission, back halved w/ 4-link, '16 F150, 5.0 Coyotte, regular cab, shortbed, lowered 3/5 & 1-owner '79 Trans Am.
    The first set up was external too but the slave was too long to fit alongside the 164 tooth flywheel bell housing regardles of how I tried to 'imagineer' it. I'm using a '70 top loader with a Hurst Super shifter with the straight rods. I really didn't want an internal throw out bearing because of possible leakage problems and having to remove the transmission and bell housing to replace it. With this set up if it fails/leaks I can just replace it off the side and not have to 'overhead press' the other parts out of the way.

    Bruce
     
  15. Reeves1

    Reeves1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Alberta Canada

Share This Page