255 V-8 Swap??

Discussion in 'Technical' started by Maverick6714, Oct 16, 2007.

  1. Maverick6714

    Maverick6714 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northeast PA
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick, 2004 Dodge Dakota Quad Cab, 1987 Ford Bronco
    Does anyone know what I would gain from switching my inline 200 cid to a V-8 255 cid? Also does anyone know of performance parts that could be used on a V-8. I know the 255 was a failed attempt by Ford at making a better emissions engine than the 302. The 255 was simply a debored 302, so it should fit right into the Maverick. Any ideas or tips would be helpful. Thanks. :hmmm:
     
  2. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    if your gonna do the V8 swap why put in an engine like that? i'd just stick with a 302.

    just going by what you say, if the only diffrence is bore i would think pretty much anything except heads and pistons would be the same.
     
  3. Ronald Hopkins

    Ronald Hopkins Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2002
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Location:
    Morristown Tennessee
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT
    I once owned a 81 THUNDERBIRD with a 255 in it. If you are going to the trouble of swaping to a v8 go with a 302.
     
  4. Maverick6714

    Maverick6714 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northeast PA
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick, 2004 Dodge Dakota Quad Cab, 1987 Ford Bronco
    How bad would the 255 be? I have access to a 82 T-bird that has a 255 in it. That is the reason for this inquiry.
     
  5. NAFORD302

    NAFORD302 Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Messages:
    803
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    107
    Location:
    SILEX MO
    Vehicle:
    77 FACTORY V8 AC CAR
    Boat Anchor
     
  6. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    ^^^that seems to be the case for just about any missions era 1980's small displacment v8

    nightmares chevy 305's and olds 307's are popping into my head now
     
  7. Maverick6714

    Maverick6714 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northeast PA
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick, 2004 Dodge Dakota Quad Cab, 1987 Ford Bronco
    How much more power would it give me over a I-6 200? And how much would a 302 give me over the 255? In the last issue of Hot Rod Mag, that article about the Maverick said that their stock 1970 Maverick with an I-6 200 put a mighty 58 hp to the ground and I need more than that.
     
  8. mav1970

    mav1970 Bob Hatcher

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    10,633
    Likes Received:
    322
    Trophy Points:
    398
    Location:
    Mountain Top Pa
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Maverick 393 Cleveland Stroker
    I had a 79 Monte Carlo with one of Chevy's 267 V8's. Their contribution to the emissions problem. It was a 2 year only engine that was also a slug. It spent it's short life mostly in passing gear trying to climb the slightest hills. I swapped in a 350 and was able to launch some of the snow tire studs through a house window.

    Look for a 302.;)
     
  9. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    i'd just go look for a 302. its not like there hard to find. ford's been making 'em for 40+ years.

    the 255 would be an improvmnt but probably not enough to make it worth it. then again if you get it running with a 255 under the hood you'll already have everything in place if you ever swap a 302 in.

    200's wre designed to make just enough power to move the car, last a while and get good gas milage. i think the 255 was made with the same goals in mind. i'd be suprised if that t-bird was putting more then 100hp to the wheels
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2007
  10. Maverick6714

    Maverick6714 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northeast PA
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick, 2004 Dodge Dakota Quad Cab, 1987 Ford Bronco
    What kind of horsepower do you think a 302 can get me to the ground?
     
  11. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    ya know i love g-bodies but unless its a turbo buick they all had a POS under the hood like that from the factory
     
  12. Maverick6714

    Maverick6714 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northeast PA
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick, 2004 Dodge Dakota Quad Cab, 1987 Ford Bronco
    Is the 70's decade 302 the best candidate for a swap?
     
  13. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    thy would probably have the highest compression, but the 1980's 5.0 roller and GT blocks are good too. you can still bolt on a 4bbl intake if you dont want the hassle of FI
     
  14. Maverick6714

    Maverick6714 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northeast PA
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick, 2004 Dodge Dakota Quad Cab, 1987 Ford Bronco
    I definately want to stay away from Fuel Injection.
     
  15. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    well an 80's 5.0 shouldnt be too hard to find, youd just have to bolt up a carb and intake and put a new timing chain cover on so you can run a mechanical fule pump unless you want an electric pump.
     

Share This Page