79 mustang 302 engine good engine to rebuild??

Discussion in 'Technical' started by fordmaverick72, Jun 5, 2011.

  1. fordmaverick72

    fordmaverick72 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Milwaukee, wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    1972 ford maverick 302 30over aod with 8.8
    looking to build a stroker out of a 302 from a 79 mustang but i have heard rumor that some engines around that time may not have been made the best for Ford.can someone with better knowledge let me know if this would be a good candidate????? the car is being sold for 450$ with 56,000 miles.
     
  2. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,824
    Likes Received:
    681
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    That block should have a D8 casting number on the side. They were a little bit stronger than the 5.0 blocks that came afterward. Depends what you're gonna do with the car. If just cruising around I would get a roller cam 5.0 block.
     
  3. fordmaverick72

    fordmaverick72 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Milwaukee, wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    1972 ford maverick 302 30over aod with 8.8
    the engine assembly is goin (331) to be done part at a local shop and part at home however could i just put together a roller cam setup or is the block configuration different to where it would not allow me to interchange those parts?(i have a roller cam and lifters out of a motor with 15,0000 miles but no block thats why i ask)
     
  4. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,824
    Likes Received:
    681
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    Look at your block, if it's set up for a roller cam it will have tall lifter bores with machined tops and two threaded bosses in the lifter valley that the lifter retainer (spider) bolts to.
     
  5. olerodder

    olerodder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    If you are just trying to make 1HP per cubic inch then I'd say the late block is fine................but if you are trying to make 1.5/1.6HP per cubic inch I would start with an early 289 or 302, personally I believe the early 289/302 blocks are much stouter than the late model stuff.......although not as strong as the Mexican 302 blocks.
    There is one 331 that made over 500hp on motor alone...........no N02 or blower...........just a single carb, AFR heads, and 640 lift cam.
    Here is a 67 289/302 in your area;

    http://milwaukee.craigslist.org/pts/2371592352.html
     
  6. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    If the casting numbers are D8VE, then you've got a winner. If not, look for a roller block. The D8VE is thicker all over like a Mexican block, but with the std main caps. It'll weigh 16 pounds more than an 80-85 block and ten pounds more than an 86-2001 roller block.
     

Share This Page