crate engine

Discussion in 'Technical' started by mcaleb, Nov 28, 2012.

  1. mcaleb

    mcaleb Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    23
    Location:
    Patterson, California
    Vehicle:
    1971 mercury comet 302
    Hey guys, so I was wondering if anyone has swapped an engine like this into their mav/comet? If so then have they had a good experience with it or is there a better option for our cars?

    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/fms-m-6007-m50/overview/


    I did some searching on google and this site, but I couldnt find any threads.
     
  2. olerodder

    olerodder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    I think there are some people who have, but the only issue is that it will not fit between the shock towers of a stock car. You will need to cut the shock towers out. Even with notched shock towers the 4.6L or 5.0L will not fit, it's just too wide. I have a 351w with notched towers.........and they are still too close together for a SOHC or DOHC 4.6l/5.0l.
    If you are willing to cut the towers out they will fit.

    http://www.rcmotorsportsinc.com/index.html
     
  3. dmhines

    dmhines Dixie Maverick Boy

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,927
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    147
    Location:
    Cumming, GA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Grabber / 2012 Mustang / 2009 Jeep Wrangler / 2013 Ducati / 2009 Buell XB12Scg
  4. Mavman72

    Mavman72 Gone backwards but lookin' forward

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6,759
    Likes Received:
    272
    Trophy Points:
    273
    Location:
    Buffalo N.Y.
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick 2 door.Original V-8 3 spd std shift.Also a 72 one owner Sprint sporting a 351 Windsor
    OK... Whos's it!...Whos been holding out on us!!!
    That is, well...:drool:
     
  5. mojo

    mojo "Everett"- Senior Citizen Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Messages:
    5,272
    Likes Received:
    833
    Trophy Points:
    513
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chicago
    Vehicle:
    73 Comet GT-302 4bl
    Got it in w/ the batt and coolant/wshield containers in stock location. Wud'nt hve thought it possible. Like to see some more/better pix of that one.
     
  6. Dave B

    Dave B I like Mavericks!

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    16,931
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Location:
    Parts Unknown......
    Vehicle:
    3 Grabbers
    Those were posted awhile ago, you guys must have missed it. I don't think the poster has been back.
     
  7. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT

    lol.. he must be working that 2nd job just to pay for it. :)

    I completely undertsnad the desire to be different and all.. but that's a hell of a lot of work.. not to mention cash.. to get 400-500 horsies stuffed in there. Course.. a nice supercharger bolted on top would let you have your cake and eat it too.

    Damned nice install for sure though. :thumbs2:
     
  8. Pony Express

    Pony Express Haul'in @**

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    839
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    65
    Location:
    DelMarVa
    Vehicle:
    1976 Maverick
    For some reason, I'm thinking the four valve is 7 1/2" wider than the two valve motors...
     
  9. olerodder

    olerodder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    The DOHC is about 30"w, 29"tall and 28" long, the SOHC is about 26"w, 26"tall and 28 long.
    The 302 is about 18.75" wide and the 351 is about 21" wide.
     
    Notorious likes this.
  10. Pony Express

    Pony Express Haul'in @**

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    839
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    65
    Location:
    DelMarVa
    Vehicle:
    1976 Maverick
    Great info - thanks!
     
  11. junrai

    junrai Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,516
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    rancho cordova ca
    Vehicle:
    1972 mercury comet 1972 comet gt
    if you were going that route and had the time you could go to the local machine shop and show them that page and tell them you want the same thing it will cost you less. or you can spend the same money and get better/stronger parts inside.

    like this example my 347 has cost me right about $3800 without the valve covers intake and carb Im coming in over 500 hp and everything inside is top grade forged parts
    and this one from summit cost alot more and doesnt have as good of parts in it
    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/mll-bp3472ctc/overview/
     
  12. Dave B

    Dave B I like Mavericks!

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    16,931
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Location:
    Parts Unknown......
    Vehicle:
    3 Grabbers
    Are you talking about the engine in the first post?
     
  13. junrai

    junrai Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,516
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    rancho cordova ca
    Vehicle:
    1972 mercury comet 1972 comet gt
    yeah Im talking about the motor in the in the original post. usually you can build any engine with better parts at the machine shop for the same money or even less than buying a crate engine.
    the nice thing about crate motors is theyre usually turn key with some adjustments
     
  14. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    that rule usually only applies to overhead valve motors that are ancient like the ones we typically use. Building these types of all aluminum overhead cam motors(especially four cams) is much more expensive and time consuming than the one you put together youself there.

    Not to mention that the cores are harder to come by and priced much higher and parts availability is considerably more limited with a small halo effect as well. If you wanna be current with the latest tech.. it'll cost ya.

    But I do agree.. there is something to be saved on the builders fee side of things if you do it yourself. I hate building those things and phasing non-stock type cams and all that crap can be a real pain compared to simply degreeing the typical overhead valve type setup.
     
  15. car-nut

    car-nut Glenn

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,299
    Likes Received:
    212
    Trophy Points:
    146
    Location:
    conn.
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick
    Had these 5.0 Coyote motors been available before I built my 302 I would have gone that route. The problem now is that I already have computer, wiring harness and everything to drop my 5.0 302 into my car. I would lose so much if I tried to sell it now, but I do find it tempting.

    That engine would be cool to have.
     

Share This Page