Opinions wanted !!!

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by boss9, May 7, 2006.

?

Which combo ?

  1. 250 - turbo

    9 vote(s)
    34.6%
  2. 351w

    17 vote(s)
    65.4%
  1. boss9

    boss9 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Akron,Ohio
    Vehicle:
    77 4-door 250 I6
    I'm picking up my 77 4-door in a couple weeks. My plan is to do a Gapp & Roush clone. The car comes with a rebuilt 250 and C4. This car will not be a strip car, although I would like to take it once or twice. I would like opinions on the following combos.

    1) - Keep the 250 and C4, upgrade to 2bbl, add a header and add a turbo and a 50 shot of go juice, 3:55 gears w/ mini spool.

    or...

    2) - 351w bored 30 over, C4 (add shiftkit), some 88300 headers and dual Flows, 3:55 gears w/ mini spool.
     
  2. blugene

    blugene Senior member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,768
    Likes Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    283
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Marietta, OK
    Vehicle:
    73 Comet GT, 72 Comet GT, 2008 "Comet" (our boxer, who is now in the galaxies)
    My opinion is rather perverted, go with hard(shift) and fast cause that's the way she likes it.:D
     
  3. Hawkco

    Hawkco Genuine Car Nut

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    5,281
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    135
    Location:
    Rex, Georgia (GA)
    Vehicle:
    77 Maverick
    Since you asked....

    Go with a stoked 302, C-4, 3.55 gears with a posi/taction loc/limited slip etc (for ultimate street use), and if you use a floor shifter, use Hooker 6901 headers.

    You asked for opinions and this one is mine. It will all depend on your pocketbook. I think the most expensive part of this project will be reproducing the paint job.
     
  4. boss9

    boss9 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Akron,Ohio
    Vehicle:
    77 4-door 250 I6
    Terry,
    I'd have to disagree with the paint job comment. Paint part is easy and a friend owns a vinyl graphics shop for the decals. However, I won't be able to reproduce the contingency decals. I'll have to go with what's available now.
     
  5. rayzorsharp

    rayzorsharp I "AM" a Maverick!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    11,256
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    298
    Location:
    Grand Bay, Alabama
    Vehicle:
    Three 71 Maverick Grabbers, a 72 302 Sprint, a 73 LDO 2door parts car, a 76 silver v8 Stallion.
    I didn't vote simply because I would do neither of the above. I agree with Hawko (and that don't happen often) about the 302 stroker. Too many problems with the 351 and too much cost in making the 250 run as good as the 302 stroker. There are a few people running 351w's so if you search the forum you should find quite a few opinions on it...mostly against. Good luck and be sure to post pics.
     
  6. Hawkco

    Hawkco Genuine Car Nut

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    5,281
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    135
    Location:
    Rex, Georgia (GA)
    Vehicle:
    77 Maverick
    If I had known that you had very good connections on getting the look, I would have disagreed with myself, too.:slap:
     
  7. boss9

    boss9 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Akron,Ohio
    Vehicle:
    77 4-door 250 I6
    razorsharp, I know about the 351w in a Mav. I went through the whole notched tower and install thing already. I just wasn't happy with the condition of the body I had, so I sold it. The reason the 351w is in the mix is because I have it in the garage already !!
     
  8. Hawkco

    Hawkco Genuine Car Nut

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    5,281
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    135
    Location:
    Rex, Georgia (GA)
    Vehicle:
    77 Maverick
    I'm gonna put on my Columbo coat and ask, "Is there anything else you need to tell us to help solve this case?" Followed by Jack Webb saying, "Just the facts, Ma'am."

    Since you have the 351W, that would be an obvious choice on my part.
     
  9. tim keck

    tim keck truckdrivintrailertrash

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    sharps chapel,Tn
    Vehicle:
    '72 Comet, '75 Maverick, '85 F150 4x4 ,'93 F150,'75 F100,'77 Jeep Wagoneer,'91 Dodge D250 Cummins,'90 F150 xtra cab 4x4, '93 F150 4x4
    I'd go with the "W",3.55's and NOS!
     
  10. boss9

    boss9 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Akron,Ohio
    Vehicle:
    77 4-door 250 I6
    Sorry Terry,
    I also have access to the 250 combo stuff . A friend used to race a Fairmont with a turbo 250.
     
  11. Hawkco

    Hawkco Genuine Car Nut

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    5,281
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    135
    Location:
    Rex, Georgia (GA)
    Vehicle:
    77 Maverick
    :slap::banghead::rant2:!#*$@?*@#$!&?:rant2: o_O:90::banghead:
     
  12. boss9

    boss9 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Akron,Ohio
    Vehicle:
    77 4-door 250 I6
  13. Rick Book

    Rick Book Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    5,744
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    197
    Location:
    Thailand
    Vehicle:
    Missing my old '70 Maverick
    Ha! "UNCLE!"


    Opinion? Like some other things that everyone has, I have one too!


    Like Ray, I didn't vote on either.

    From what I've read, a stroked 302 base is (arguably) much easier to install than the 351 (I, personally, wouldn't even consider putting a 6 cylinder in it).

    Since your'e not ruling out spray, the weakest link is in the block (in either the 302 based or 351 based). You can spray 500 h.p. at it - or even a 1000 so getting the horsepower is not an issue, right?

    Just because you have the 351 doesn't mean you have to use it (or the 6), You could, more than likely, trade that 351 for a 302 based engine - maybe even a 347 short block.

    So, to me, it comes down to the 'hassle-factor' (which one is easier to do).

    I'm all about getting things done the easiest way (they call it being "Lazy" here in Texas ;) ).

    Good luck with the project either way you go. I think it'll be very neat!
     
  14. Mavaholic

    Mavaholic Growing older but not up!

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,992
    Likes Received:
    209
    Trophy Points:
    258
    Location:
    Live Oak, FL
    Vehicle:
    Original 72 Sprint Owner, 71 Comet GT, 57 Ranchwagon, 57 4 dr Wagon
    Either way I think it is going to be way cool!!!!!! But I'd go for the cubes.
     
  15. sierra grabber

    sierra grabber Certifiable

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    2,808
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    northern nevada
    Vehicle:
    71 grabber red and black; 74 2dr LDO comet
    terry,:bowdown::rofl2:

    boss 9, if its only a choice between the two id go 351. of course id build it to be driven on the street a lot cause i love driving my car around town. :tiphat:
     

Share This Page