Re: I think '65-'66 were high compression units.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Maverick Message Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by rickyracer, (IP: 209.20.173.93) on September 17, 1999 at 01:36:20:

In Reply to: I think '65-'66 were high compression units. posted by T.L. on September 17, 1999 at 00:02:39:

as far as high comp, only because of the small chambers , valve size was small to, ports exh, specially suck badly,
: :
Went and picked up the '67 289 today. Paid $50.00 for it. Have the block
: : sold already. Actually traded it for a fresh AOD tranny. One of the heads
: : has me concerned though. One of the outside cylinders has lots of corrosion
: : on the combustion chamber.As if it had a blown head gasket (optimistic)
: : or a crack (my luck). Whatever it is I hope it can be fixed. The other seven chambers
: : look great. The heads have "289" stamped on one side and "66" stamped on the other
: : and the casting number appears to be "7A20." If anyone has any insight on old Ford
: : heads, could you please give me an idea as to what they came out of? Out of
: : curiosity mostly...

: : Thanks, Brian.

: : P.S. I'd like to thank everyone for there ideas and suggestions over the last few
: : days. It was greatly appreciated.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Maverick Message Board ] [ FAQ ]