Re: What do ya think? | |||
Re: What do ya think? -- 74Grabber | Post Reply | Top of thread | Maverick Message Board |
Posted by: Fred H ® 2001/08/29, 17:43:05 Author Profile |
David, if you are going to go this route, I think the cam you had mentioned earlier is appropriate for your combination. I think the 3.73 is a little steep if you are building a 5500 rpm motor. I'd try a 3.55 unless you are willing to turn it a little harder. In that case I would go with a 3.73. As far as the 351W is concerned, I am not sure if there is a shelf header is mad for that application. I am sure someone else on the board knows whether or not one is available. I do not know what you budget constraints are but, in my opinion, the 351W is the way to go. Headers will be expensive if they have to be custom made. I have one in my '70 and would never run another 302. However, I did have to have headers built for it (cost $800). That 396 can be a real animal if you put the right cylinder head, cam and pistons in it. If there are budget concerns, then go with the 302 stroker and you can run a shelf header (although it only has 1 5/8" primaries, but will work). The 347 and 355" motors work real well with NOS and you do not have to turn them that high. It' not 396 inches but, with proper set up, you will not be disappointed.
:Man better halves can be fun at times. Ok so the roller motor plan is on hold. The better half didn't like the idea of me swapping out motors the way i planned it - and honestly i am still undecided what way i want to go as far as 302 stroker, roller 302, roller 302 stroker or 351 stroker. I got a stock 1974 302 in the car now, rated at 138hp and 238 ft/tq with 87K on it. It smokes abit on startup - valve seals i am told - but runs strong and doesn't burn oil ect ect. The pistons are cast (i am assuming) and it has 8.0:1 compression (according to the book) So, heres the question (actually afew of em)
|
Post Reply | Alert | Original message Top of thread Return to the MMB |
Replies to this message |
|