0-60, What is considered fast?

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by downhillbiker, Mar 15, 2012.

  1. YellowStangDuan

    YellowStangDuan Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    62
    Location:
    Arlington, Texas
    Vehicle:
    71 Grabber
    I tried that ..once... The tape holding the dollar bill to the dash came loose on the launch, and the dollar bill cut the poor guys throat open!
    Well, not really...

    My old stock 6 that was pretty quick would go 60mph in the 1/8, low 11's
    Now with the Explorer 5.0 it goes high 8's @ 76mph, but 330' is 5.75 @ 60mph for comparison.
    My Mustang is going 72mph in 4.75 seconds, mid 7's 1/8
     
  2. Mad Goon

    Mad Goon Scaring the Hondas

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,058
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    147
    Location:
    Redondo Beach, California
    Vehicle:
    71 Comet 4dr(SOLD), 2016 Mustang GT Premium
    I think a factory stock 71 Maverick with a 302 and C4 did 0-60 in something like 9 seconds. Headers, a good intake manifold and dual exhaust seem to really wake these cars up, but I doubt unless a decent amount of work is done to the car a sub 0-60 time is easily attainable.
     
  3. dmhines

    dmhines Dixie Maverick Boy

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,927
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    147
    Location:
    Cumming, GA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Grabber / 2012 Mustang / 2009 Jeep Wrangler / 2013 Ducati / 2009 Buell XB12Scg
    4.27?? That is very fast ... a new Boss 302 does 0-60 in 4.0 flat ...

    I would think a Maverick would need around 325HP at the rear wheels to 0-60 in 4.27 ...
     
  4. darren

    darren Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,852
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    East of Dave
    Vehicle:
    72 302 Maverick

    ITs real hard to get it close to accurate by hand. Seems like you a bit quick for your drivetrain to me.
     
  5. RASelkirk

    RASelkirk Retired!

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Port Neches, TX
    Vehicle:
    Sonic Blue '72 w/LS-1, 200R4, 9" w/3.50
    A lot depends on what you're "used to". A top fuel driver would prolly think anything less than a 2 sec 0-60 as slow, while your granny might think 20 seconds was too quick. I used to think my '98 Dakota p/u (6.18 secs) was quick, but my little turbo S-10 rips off 4.35's and that makes the Dodge look like a bus. BTW, that 4.35 was a 12.17 quarter so you're looking pretty good!
     
  6. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    there's a difference between a "fast" car and a "quick" car also.
    you can have a high 9 second 1/4 mile car that tops out at 145mph.


    9 seconds is very quick, but compare it to a supercar that only runs low 12s in the quarter BUT tops out at 200mph.

    when you compare it that way the 9 second car is not fast at all compared to the 12 second car.


    and the 200mph car is not quick compared to the 145mph/9second car.

    thats what I was thinking also, but those apps are very optimistic .
     
  7. silver70

    silver70 Eric

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick
    I'd say 1.2 seconds is a good, round number to shoot for. :D
     
  8. don graham

    don graham MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,800
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    302
    Location:
    arizona city, az.
    Vehicle:
    70 mav, 71 grabber, 73 Comet, 2004 f-250 crew cab diesel, 2001 f-250, 2004 explorer, 2007 Gold Wing trike.
    I run low 1.80's for a 60' time. I don't want it to go any faster as my class is limited to 12.0 in the 1/4. Last time out at Firebird I ran 11.86 in the time trial. Fun thing is when some car is just a little slower than me passes me early on then lets off thinking I had a really bad light. Then I go by him at the other end doing 116mph.:)
     
  9. downhillbiker

    downhillbiker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Vehicle:
    1976 Stallion/Grabber
    Wow ok. I was hoping my car would be 13/14 second quarter, but with my 0-60 at 4.2 and yours at 1.8 with a 12 quarter looks like mine might be a lot slower than I thought...
     
  10. silver70

    silver70 Eric

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick
    I think that's his 60 foot time. If that was his 0-60 mph, he'd have around an 8 second car in the 1/4.

    Don't know what you've done to your car, but, I think the new mustangs are spinning around a 5 second 0-60 mph time and they're running in the mid-13's in the 1/4.

    However, I could be mistaken on these numbers.
     
  11. mav6977

    mav6977 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2002
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    60
    Location:
    Wichita Falls TX
    Vehicle:
    various years
    Here you Go.

    In a 1971 Motor Trend test between a Nova 350 SS, Hornet SC360, 360 Duster, and a 71 Comet GT with 302/3-speed floor shift and 3.00 gears, it did 0-60 in 8.7 seconds and the quarter in 16.2. Single exhaust too! For comparison a 70 Grabber with 250/Automatic with 3.00 gears did 0-60 in 10.8 seconds. The 69 1/2's and 70 200 did (according to the magazine road test's I have) 14.5 with auto and 12.3 with column shifted stick. The same years with the 170 and three speed averaged 15 seconds to 60. In a Special Interest Auto magazine from 1974 the 250/3-speed did 0-60 in 12 seconds flat. Most Consumer Reports tests with a combo of 250/200 (mostly with auto's) were in the 17-19 second range. But they drove like little old blue haired ladies. Most folks could beat those times. Their 73 with 250/Auto took 16.3 but mine will consistantly do it in 14. For comparison early Pintos with the 2.0 and four speed with 3.55 gears would do 0-60 in 11.3 and the early German built Capri's with the same engine would do it in 10.8. The 1.6 liter pintos usually took around 18-19 seconds.
     
  12. downhillbiker

    downhillbiker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Vehicle:
    1976 Stallion/Grabber
    Ok, ya that sounds more like it. I didn't even realize there was a 60' time measurement. So I will hope for low 14's and anything less would be a bonus.
     
  13. silver70

    silver70 Eric

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick
    Let us know how you do when you take it out. I'd say, with the stuff listed in your description, you oughtta be about right. Heads are a huge factor. Don't know what you're running for those. Take some pics, too. We like pics. :thumbs2:

    Eric
     

Share This Page