Getting ready for Silver State 2012 . . .

Discussion in 'Technical' started by mashori, Jun 6, 2012.

  1. mashori

    mashori Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,630
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, Ca
    Vehicle:
    1971 V8 Maverick
    Air cleaner is K&N
    I'll look into the wires.
     
  2. mashori

    mashori Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,630
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, Ca
    Vehicle:
    1971 V8 Maverick
    Had to make the baffles in the valve covers fit....

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  3. mashori

    mashori Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,630
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, Ca
    Vehicle:
    1971 V8 Maverick
    Actually these little marks on the baffle are from the rocker that was coming loose

    [​IMG]
     
  4. mashori

    mashori Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,630
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, Ca
    Vehicle:
    1971 V8 Maverick
    I just traced the passenger side onto the driver's side and I was done. Got new valve cover gaskets and installed them after putting some locktite on the nuts holding the baffles in place.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  5. olerodder

    olerodder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    That's the reason I don't think a flat plate type of baffle is benefical on a race motor............or any motor that sees a constant or high rpm....I use a tube with internal baffles............................IMHO
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2012
  6. mashori

    mashori Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,630
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, Ca
    Vehicle:
    1971 V8 Maverick
    I've been looking for an alternative to the plate setup I have right now. Where can I get something like that? Thanks for posting the pics.
     
  7. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    good point!

    at least in this case though.. those girdles will help reduce oil splash by at least a bit.

    as for the air filter base.. there is power and throttle response to be had by all if one chooses wisely. R2C makes some killer stuff and that would be my first stop before settling for an off the shelf cookie cutter type setup.

    Since you're obviously no stranger to mod work and improvisation.. I would try to merge these designs.. http://www.r2cperformance.com/products/product.aspx?ProductId=264.. into another base whenever possible... or see if the complete setup will work for you. I've even seen the occassional need to rejet just because of the cfm increase with these things when moving from poorly designed bases. It's usually on the higher rpm builds.. but even the little dogs should see partial gain.


    and this.. http://www.knfilters.com/racing/flowcontrol.htm.. is a design I've used at least 4 times in that past(they are huge and limited to non-HP style main bodies which makes them tough to shoehorn into many bays though).. that I intend to merge that R2C base into because I feel that the R2C stuff has too small a diameter(14 inch compared to the flow controls 16 inch) and therefore too steep an incline(it's like a wall at the base of the radius IMO).

    Never tried the R2C filters.. but I do know a few teams/guys that use them and swear that they made more power than the other stuff.
     
  8. olerodder

    olerodder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
  9. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    I like the ones on top due to the smaller footprint and less clearancing issues.
    http://www.summitracing.com/search/Part-Type/Valve-Cover-Baffles/

    TBH... I don't think you'll be able to use a shorter cover and will need to step up to a tall enough version for traditional baffles(that olerodder mentioned above) to be able to clear those girdles.
     
  10. olerodder

    olerodder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    I think Mo has the same valve covers I do, and with the mod of drilling holes in the baffle should get just barely enough clearance. My girdles are just a little thicker because the valves are not in-line...........but I cracked a set of these covers using flat baffles..............I miss gauged by 1/32"...
    I just don't like anything inside the valve covers...........except for the squirters which need to be there. Another thing to remember is that in an endurance motor...90miles is a long/short race things do get warm in the motor and things do grow just a little.........................IMHO
     
  11. mashori

    mashori Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,630
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, Ca
    Vehicle:
    1971 V8 Maverick
    Darn, I just realized I forgot to check for clearance between those girdlesI installed and the rockers at max height. My engine dude said it needs to be at least 1/8"....
     
  12. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    do you have a hydraulic setup?

    if so.. then be sure to allow that extra bit just in case you overreved it/pumped up the lifters/floated the valves a bit. Because rev limiters won't always save your ass every time. lol
     
  13. mashori

    mashori Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,630
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, Ca
    Vehicle:
    1971 V8 Maverick
    yes hydraulic lifters! and since I'm very adept at overreving I will definitely take extra care making my measurements
     
  14. olerodder

    olerodder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    One other thing you may want to think about since it looks like you've got more clearance than my engine combonation................are a set of these;

    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/STF-63940/?rtype=10

    This would mean you wouldn't have to to anything to the baffles you have already put in the covers and would have plenty of room above the girdles, but it would mean getting studs for the valve covers and two sets of gaskets. The gaskets I have to keep everything sealed up are these;

    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/FEL-1684/
     
  15. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    IMO, you might as well just buy a good set of taller fabbed valve covers(with better baffles to begin with) once you get into the cost of spacers like that.

    and I use these gaskets on my 383 due to price. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-G2301/

    And I believe.. Mr gasket maybe?.. also makes the cheaper rubber/steel core gaskets too. They aren't quite as good as the felpros that rodder linked above.. but all you need do is to use a light coat of sealer to add insurance because of the flat design.
     

Share This Page